Patient-Reported Burdens of Undergoing Antenatal Fetal Surveillance

Objective: Antenatal fetal surveillance (AFS) is recommended to prevent stillbirth in high-risk pregnancies. Data assessing the patient experience of these regimens are lacking. We aimed to describe the patient-reported burdens of attending AFS and analyze associations between visit frequency, over time, and with pregnancy and demographic characteristics. Study Design: This is a cross-sectional survey of patients attending AFS. The survey was available in English and Spanish and could be taken serially. Patients answered demographic questions and rated their agreement regarding how attending AFS burdened their life in multiple domains on a 7-point Likert scale. Responses between once- and twice-weekly testing groups were compared. To examine characteristics contributing to high burden, demographic and patient-level factors were compared using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Participant score of burden between their first and last completion were assessed. Patient and provider indications were compared. Results: < 0.01). There was no difference in burdens over time in those with multiple completions. Patients underreported obesity as an indication for AFS. Conclusion: This is the first documented report showing that burdens are commonly reported by patients undergoing AFS. More patient-centered work is needed exploring these findings so that AFS may minimize harm and maximize benefit. Key Points: · When patients in a maternal-fetal medicine antenatal testing unit were surveyed regarding burdens in domains related to employment, finances, and childcare, 14 to 42% of patients reported some degree of burden in at least one domain.. · Burdens were increased for patients who were prescribed twice-weekly compared with once-weekly schedules. The patients who reported burdens were more likely to be older and have gestational diabetes.. · These novel findings of patient-experienced burdens should prompt providers to use shared decision-making when developing AFS regimens..

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
American Journal of Perinatology
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2914-4264
Primary Topic
Global Maternal and Child Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Patient-Reported Burdens of Undergoing Antenatal Fetal Surveillance

Alison G. Cahill, Lorie M. Harper, Marta J. Perez, Sarah Lasater et al.
American Journal of Perinatology
Global Maternal and Child Health
article

Patient-Reported Burdens of Undergoing Antenatal Fetal Surveillance

Alison G. Cahill, Lorie M. Harper, Marta J. Perez, Sarah Lasater, Chinenye Ogbonnah, Miriam Alvarez
article en

Abstract

Objective: Antenatal fetal surveillance (AFS) is recommended to prevent stillbirth in high-risk pregnancies. Data assessing the patient experience of these regimens are lacking. We aimed to describe the patient-reported burdens of attending AFS and analyze associations between visit frequency, over time, and with pregnancy and demographic characteristics. Study Design: This is a cross-sectional survey of patients attending AFS. The survey was available in English and Spanish and could be taken serially. Patients answered demographic questions and rated their agreement regarding how attending AFS burdened their life in multiple domains on a 7-point Likert scale. Responses between once- and twice-weekly testing groups were compared. To examine characteristics contributing to high burden, demographic and patient-level factors were compared using chi-square and Fisher's exact tests. Participant score of burden between their first and last completion were assessed. Patient and provider indications were compared. Results: < 0.01). There was no difference in burdens over time in those with multiple completions. Patients underreported obesity as an indication for AFS. Conclusion: This is the first documented report showing that burdens are commonly reported by patients undergoing AFS. More patient-centered work is needed exploring these findings so that AFS may minimize harm and maximize benefit. Key Points: · When patients in a maternal-fetal medicine antenatal testing unit were surveyed regarding burdens in domains related to employment, finances, and childcare, 14 to 42% of patients reported some degree of burden in at least one domain.. · Burdens were increased for patients who were prescribed twice-weekly compared with once-weekly schedules. The patients who reported burdens were more likely to be older and have gestational diabetes.. · These novel findings of patient-experienced burdens should prompt providers to use shared decision-making when developing AFS regimens..

American Journal of Perinatology
Seton Medical Center (US), Rex Medical (United States) (US), The University of Texas at Austin (US), Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Global Maternal and Child Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.