A Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Classification of Parkinson’s Disease During a Working Memory and Sustained Attention Task

Background and Objectives: Individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) experience deficits in working memory (WM) and sustained attention (ATTN), but diagnosing and monitoring these deficits remains challenging. This study compares machine learning (ML) classification models trained on EEG and pupillometry data from WM and ATTN tasks to identify task-specific and shared cognitive biomarkers of PD. Methods: EEG and pupillometry were recorded from PD patients and healthy controls (HC) during a visual change detection WM task and a continuous performance ATTN task. A standardized toolbox extracted 108 features, reduced via PCA and recursive elimination (RE) and classified using an SVM-RBF within a nested, 5-fold cross-validated pipeline, with class balancing (SMOTE) and feature selection performed strictly within training folds to prevent leakage. Results: On internal test folds, WM achieved 71% accuracy (F1 = 0.701) and ATTN achieved 73% (F1 = 0.699); on an independent hold-out set, WM achieved 63% accuracy (F1 = 0.626) and ATTN achieved 70% (F1 = 0.623). ATTN showed higher accuracy and precision, WM showed higher recall, and univariate analyses independently supported several top-ranked features (e.g., theta/beta and alpha/theta ratios); PAI and FAA, though top features in both tasks, reached univariate significance only in ATTN. These results indicate WM and ATTN yield complementary, task-linked neurophysiological signatures relevant to PD classification. Conclusion: At its current stage, this pipeline functions as a research tool for biomarker discovery rather than a clinical diagnostic, though larger, externally validated samples could support future screening and monitoring applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Brain Sciences
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci16080781
Primary Topic
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Classification of Parkinson’s Disease During a Working Memory and Sustained Attention Task

Asenath X. A. Huether, Samuel A. Birkholz, Enrique Alvarez Vazquez, Mercedes Terry et al.
Brain Sciences
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
article

A Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Classification of Parkinson’s Disease During a Working Memory and Sustained Attention Task

Asenath X. A. Huether, Samuel A. Birkholz, Enrique Alvarez Vazquez, Mercedes Terry, Jau‐Shin Lou, Jessica Keller, Jeffrey S. Johnson
article en

Abstract

Background and Objectives: Individuals with Parkinson’s disease (PD) experience deficits in working memory (WM) and sustained attention (ATTN), but diagnosing and monitoring these deficits remains challenging. This study compares machine learning (ML) classification models trained on EEG and pupillometry data from WM and ATTN tasks to identify task-specific and shared cognitive biomarkers of PD. Methods: EEG and pupillometry were recorded from PD patients and healthy controls (HC) during a visual change detection WM task and a continuous performance ATTN task. A standardized toolbox extracted 108 features, reduced via PCA and recursive elimination (RE) and classified using an SVM-RBF within a nested, 5-fold cross-validated pipeline, with class balancing (SMOTE) and feature selection performed strictly within training folds to prevent leakage. Results: On internal test folds, WM achieved 71% accuracy (F1 = 0.701) and ATTN achieved 73% (F1 = 0.699); on an independent hold-out set, WM achieved 63% accuracy (F1 = 0.626) and ATTN achieved 70% (F1 = 0.623). ATTN showed higher accuracy and precision, WM showed higher recall, and univariate analyses independently supported several top-ranked features (e.g., theta/beta and alpha/theta ratios); PAI and FAA, though top features in both tasks, reached univariate significance only in ATTN. These results indicate WM and ATTN yield complementary, task-linked neurophysiological signatures relevant to PD classification. Conclusion: At its current stage, this pipeline functions as a research tool for biomarker discovery rather than a clinical diagnostic, though larger, externally validated samples could support future screening and monitoring applications.

Brain SciencesVol. 16(8)
Sanford Health (US), Minnesota State University Moorhead (US), Minnesota State Community and Technical College (US), University of North Dakota (US), North Dakota State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Parkinson's Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.