Understanding ‘knowledge-rich curriculum’ and ‘powerful knowledge’ in England’s Curriculum and Assessment Review: a case for educational and curriculum thinking

For over two decades, competency- and outcomes-based approaches have shaped curriculum reform internationally. England’s continued commitment to a knowledge-rich, subject-organised national curriculum represents a distinctive position within this context. Following the 2025 Curriculum and Assessment Review, this commitment has generated renewed debate about the meaning of a knowledge-rich curriculum and the role of powerful knowledge. This article argues that understanding these concepts requires a more adequately developed form of curriculum thinking capable of systematically relating educational purposes, knowledge, and teaching within the national curriculum. It develops a conceptual account of the national curriculum as an institutional educational undertaking operating across policy, programmatic, and classroom domains. On this basis, it reconceptualises knowledge-rich curriculum and powerful knowledge as curriculum concepts whose meanings are constituted through their relation to educational purposes, subject organisation, and classroom enactment. Drawing on Didaktik and related educational scholarship, the article makes a case for educational and curriculum thinking in understanding and developing the national curriculum. It concludes that England’s knowledge-rich orientation represents a distinctive approach to curriculum and offers an important alternative perspective on contemporary curriculum reform internationally.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Oxford Review of Education
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2026.2703247
Primary Topic
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Understanding ‘knowledge-rich curriculum’ and ‘powerful knowledge’ in England’s Curriculum and Assessment Review: a case for educational and curriculum thinking

Zongyi Deng
Oxford Review of Education
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
article

Understanding ‘knowledge-rich curriculum’ and ‘powerful knowledge’ in England’s Curriculum and Assessment Review: a case for educational and curriculum thinking

Zongyi Deng
article en

Abstract

For over two decades, competency- and outcomes-based approaches have shaped curriculum reform internationally. England’s continued commitment to a knowledge-rich, subject-organised national curriculum represents a distinctive position within this context. Following the 2025 Curriculum and Assessment Review, this commitment has generated renewed debate about the meaning of a knowledge-rich curriculum and the role of powerful knowledge. This article argues that understanding these concepts requires a more adequately developed form of curriculum thinking capable of systematically relating educational purposes, knowledge, and teaching within the national curriculum. It develops a conceptual account of the national curriculum as an institutional educational undertaking operating across policy, programmatic, and classroom domains. On this basis, it reconceptualises knowledge-rich curriculum and powerful knowledge as curriculum concepts whose meanings are constituted through their relation to educational purposes, subject organisation, and classroom enactment. Drawing on Didaktik and related educational scholarship, the article makes a case for educational and curriculum thinking in understanding and developing the national curriculum. It concludes that England’s knowledge-rich orientation represents a distinctive approach to curriculum and offers an important alternative perspective on contemporary curriculum reform internationally.

Oxford Review of Education
University College London (GB), Bedford College (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Educational Theory and Curriculum Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.