Non-contrast MRI Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Recurrence and Progression-Free Survival in Cervical Cancer following Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Background: Accurate prognostic stratification following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for cervical cancer remains challenging. Existing approaches often rely on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which limits applicability in patients with renal dysfunction and in resourcelimited settings. We aimed to develop and validate a non-contrast MRI-based prognosis prediction model combined with clinical predictors to estimate recurrence risk and progression-free survival (PFS). Materials and Methods: A total of 145 cervical cancer patients from two centers were retrospectively analyzed. The model-building cohort (n=114) was used to extract radiomics features from pre-treatment MRI, and an extreme gradient boosting classifier was developed. Clinical predictors were identified through univariate Cox and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A nomogram integrating radiomics and clinical variables was then constructed. External validation was performed in an independent cohort (n=31). Model performance was assessed by discrimination, calibration, and its ability to stratify patients into low- and high-risk groups for predicting 5-year PFS. Results: The proposed method categorized patients into well-defined risk groups. Survival results varied greatly among groups. Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that patients with high risk had a worse 5-year PFS compared to those with low risk. This result was observed in both the construction cohort (P < 0.001) and the external validation cohort (P=0.012). The prognostic performance was comparable to that of contrast-enhanced MRI–based models. A significant point to note is that no gadolinium administration was necessary. Discussion: This study develops a radiomics nomogram that relies on non-contrast MRI. The model offers strong and tailored prognostic information. Imaging features and clinical predictors combined, which improved predictive accuracy. The approach increases accessibility, particularly for patients contraindicated for contrast or in low-resource settings. Conclusion: We developed and validated a non-contrast MRI radiomics nomogram that accurately predicts recurrence and 5-year PFS following CCRT in cervical cancer. The model offers a clinically applicable, cost-effective tool for personalized risk stratification.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/0115734056449836260717192214
Primary Topic
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-contrast MRI Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Recurrence and Progression-Free Survival in Cervical Cancer following Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Yun Tian, Jing You, Yunong Gao, Wei Wang et al.
Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging Reviews
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
article

Non-contrast MRI Radiomics Nomogram for Predicting Recurrence and Progression-Free Survival in Cervical Cancer following Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy

Yun Tian, Jing You, Yunong Gao, Wei Wang, Xiao-Ting Li, Xiaofan Li, Min Gao, Kun Cao, Lu Y, Y M Jiang, Hong Zheng
article en

Abstract

Background: Accurate prognostic stratification following concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) for cervical cancer remains challenging. Existing approaches often rely on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), which limits applicability in patients with renal dysfunction and in resourcelimited settings. We aimed to develop and validate a non-contrast MRI-based prognosis prediction model combined with clinical predictors to estimate recurrence risk and progression-free survival (PFS). Materials and Methods: A total of 145 cervical cancer patients from two centers were retrospectively analyzed. The model-building cohort (n=114) was used to extract radiomics features from pre-treatment MRI, and an extreme gradient boosting classifier was developed. Clinical predictors were identified through univariate Cox and multivariate logistic regression analyses. A nomogram integrating radiomics and clinical variables was then constructed. External validation was performed in an independent cohort (n=31). Model performance was assessed by discrimination, calibration, and its ability to stratify patients into low- and high-risk groups for predicting 5-year PFS. Results: The proposed method categorized patients into well-defined risk groups. Survival results varied greatly among groups. Kaplan–Meier analysis indicated that patients with high risk had a worse 5-year PFS compared to those with low risk. This result was observed in both the construction cohort (P < 0.001) and the external validation cohort (P=0.012). The prognostic performance was comparable to that of contrast-enhanced MRI–based models. A significant point to note is that no gadolinium administration was necessary. Discussion: This study develops a radiomics nomogram that relies on non-contrast MRI. The model offers strong and tailored prognostic information. Imaging features and clinical predictors combined, which improved predictive accuracy. The approach increases accessibility, particularly for patients contraindicated for contrast or in low-resource settings. Conclusion: We developed and validated a non-contrast MRI radiomics nomogram that accurately predicts recurrence and 5-year PFS following CCRT in cervical cancer. The model offers a clinically applicable, cost-effective tool for personalized risk stratification.

Current Medical Imaging Formerly Current Medical Imaging ReviewsVol. 22
University of the Sciences (US), Beijing Normal University (CN), Ministry of Education (ET)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Endometrial and Cervical Cancer Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.