Prognostic implications of superior mesenteric vein/portal vein resection and histologic venous invasion in BR/LA PDAC after neoadjuvant therapy

BACKGROUND: Superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (SMV/PV) resection is often required in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR/LA PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), but its prognostic relevance and the role of histopathologic venous invasion remain unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed BR/LA PDAC patients undergoing pancreatectomy after NAT and compared perioperative and oncologic outcomes between patients requiring SMV/PV resection and those with venous preservation. Subgroup analyses assessed histopathologic venous invasion within the resection cohort. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and Cox regression was used to identify factors associated with OS. RESULTS: Among 117 patients, 65 (55.6%) underwent SMV/PV resection and 52 (44.4%) had venous preservation. Although baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were broadly similar, the resection cohort showed greater local anatomic and operative complexity. Postoperative morbidity and mortality did not differ significantly between groups. Median OS was similar between the SMV/PV resection and preservation groups (16.0 vs. 22.0 months; P = 0.965), as was median DFS (10.0 vs. 12.0 months; P = 0.843). Within the resection cohort, histopathologically confirmed venous invasion was associated with significantly shorter OS (8.3 vs. 24.0 months; P < 0.0001) and DFS (5.0 vs. 17.0 months; P = 0.0002), whereas survival was similar between patients with venous preservation and those who underwent resection without venous invasion. R0 resection was associated with longer OS and DFS than R1 resection. In multivariable analysis, R1 resection and histopathologically confirmed SMV/PV invasion were independently associated with poorer OS. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, patients requiring SMV/PV resection had outcomes broadly comparable to those with venous preservation despite greater operative complexity. Histopathologic venous invasion and R1 status were associated with worse OS and DFS. These findings support interpreting SMV/PV resection primarily as a marker of local anatomic disease extent rather than an independent adverse prognostic factor.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00423-026-04145-9
Primary Topic
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prognostic implications of superior mesenteric vein/portal vein resection and histologic venous invasion in BR/LA PDAC after neoadjuvant therapy

Alper Doğruöz, Carsten Jäger, Florian Scheufele, J M. Zhang et al.
Langenbeck s Archives of Surgery
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
article

Prognostic implications of superior mesenteric vein/portal vein resection and histologic venous invasion in BR/LA PDAC after neoadjuvant therapy

Alper Doğruöz, Carsten Jäger, Florian Scheufele, J M. Zhang, İhsan Ekin Demir, Helmut Friess, Lei Ren
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Superior mesenteric vein/portal vein (SMV/PV) resection is often required in borderline resectable or locally advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (BR/LA PDAC) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT), but its prognostic relevance and the role of histopathologic venous invasion remain unclear. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed BR/LA PDAC patients undergoing pancreatectomy after NAT and compared perioperative and oncologic outcomes between patients requiring SMV/PV resection and those with venous preservation. Subgroup analyses assessed histopathologic venous invasion within the resection cohort. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), and Cox regression was used to identify factors associated with OS. RESULTS: Among 117 patients, 65 (55.6%) underwent SMV/PV resection and 52 (44.4%) had venous preservation. Although baseline demographic and clinical characteristics were broadly similar, the resection cohort showed greater local anatomic and operative complexity. Postoperative morbidity and mortality did not differ significantly between groups. Median OS was similar between the SMV/PV resection and preservation groups (16.0 vs. 22.0 months; P = 0.965), as was median DFS (10.0 vs. 12.0 months; P = 0.843). Within the resection cohort, histopathologically confirmed venous invasion was associated with significantly shorter OS (8.3 vs. 24.0 months; P < 0.0001) and DFS (5.0 vs. 17.0 months; P = 0.0002), whereas survival was similar between patients with venous preservation and those who underwent resection without venous invasion. R0 resection was associated with longer OS and DFS than R1 resection. In multivariable analysis, R1 resection and histopathologically confirmed SMV/PV invasion were independently associated with poorer OS. CONCLUSIONS: In our cohort, patients requiring SMV/PV resection had outcomes broadly comparable to those with venous preservation despite greater operative complexity. Histopathologic venous invasion and R1 status were associated with worse OS and DFS. These findings support interpreting SMV/PV resection primarily as a marker of local anatomic disease extent rather than an independent adverse prognostic factor.

Langenbeck s Archives of SurgeryVol. 411(1)
TUM Klinikum (DE), Affiliated Hospital of Southwest Medical University (CN)
Technische Universität München
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Pancreatic and Hepatic Oncology Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.