Transparency in healthcare AI: Testing EU regulatory provisions against users’ transparency needs

Algorithmic systems play an essential role in healthcare and are pervasively incorporated into medical software and equipment. In the European Union, providers must share transparency information with deployers (users) via a document called Instructions for Use (IFU, Directive 2024/1689 or AI Act). This study tests the extent to which deployers' transparency needs map onto the structure of an IFU document. A survey was administered online via the Qualtrics platform to four types of deployers, i.e., managers (N = 238), healthcare professionals (N = 115), patients (N = 229), and information technology workers (N = 230). The participants rated the relevance of a set of transparency needs and selected the IFU section more likely to address them. The results reveal differentiated priorities across user types and reveal potential weaknesses in locating some transparency information. Recommendations to build a locally meaningful IFU are derived.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLOS Digital Health
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0001594
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Transparency in healthcare AI: Testing EU regulatory provisions against users’ transparency needs

Patrik Pluchino, Anna Spagnolli, Elisa Beretta, Cecilia Tolomini et al.
PLOS Digital Health
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Transparency in healthcare AI: Testing EU regulatory provisions against users’ transparency needs

Patrik Pluchino, Anna Spagnolli, Elisa Beretta, Cecilia Tolomini, Claudio Sarra
article en

Abstract

Algorithmic systems play an essential role in healthcare and are pervasively incorporated into medical software and equipment. In the European Union, providers must share transparency information with deployers (users) via a document called Instructions for Use (IFU, Directive 2024/1689 or AI Act). This study tests the extent to which deployers' transparency needs map onto the structure of an IFU document. A survey was administered online via the Qualtrics platform to four types of deployers, i.e., managers (N = 238), healthcare professionals (N = 115), patients (N = 229), and information technology workers (N = 230). The participants rated the relevance of a set of transparency needs and selected the IFU section more likely to address them. The results reveal differentiated priorities across user types and reveal potential weaknesses in locating some transparency information. Recommendations to build a locally meaningful IFU are derived.

PLOS Digital HealthVol. 5(7)
University of Padua (IT)
European Commission
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.