Occupational interventions and their effects on work-related and mental health outcomes: A scoping review protocol

BACKGROUND: The well-being of individuals within their workplace (i.e., workplace mental health) has important implications for their productivity and mental health. The extensive literature on the effectiveness of individual workplace interventions does not yet include a comprehensive synthesis of occupational interventions delivered in workplace settings. OBJECTIVE: The proposed scoping review is designed to identify and categorize occupational interventions studied in the literature; and 2) map reported effects on work-related outcomes and mental health outcomes. METHODS: The review will examine five online databases to identify relevant articles: Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria will encompass peer-reviewed English-language studies published from 2005 to 2025, focusing on the effects of occupational interventions designed to improve workplace mental health. The results will support work participation among working adults. DISCUSSION: The review will examine the effects of current occupational interventions on workers' mental health and well-being, as well as on work-related outcomes (e.g., work participation, productivity). The review results can inform researchers designing future studies assessing the effectiveness of occupational interventions on mental health and guide the development of new interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0354462
Primary Topic
Workplace Health and Well-being
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Occupational interventions and their effects on work-related and mental health outcomes: A scoping review protocol

Behdin Nowrouzi‐Kia, R. Nicholas Carleton, Sana Siddiqui, Raihana Premji et al.
PLoS ONE
Workplace Health and Well-being
article

Occupational interventions and their effects on work-related and mental health outcomes: A scoping review protocol

Behdin Nowrouzi‐Kia, R. Nicholas Carleton, Sana Siddiqui, Raihana Premji, Hong Ki Chloe Lau, Grant Hamblin, Armaan Rehman Shah
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The well-being of individuals within their workplace (i.e., workplace mental health) has important implications for their productivity and mental health. The extensive literature on the effectiveness of individual workplace interventions does not yet include a comprehensive synthesis of occupational interventions delivered in workplace settings. OBJECTIVE: The proposed scoping review is designed to identify and categorize occupational interventions studied in the literature; and 2) map reported effects on work-related outcomes and mental health outcomes. METHODS: The review will examine five online databases to identify relevant articles: Embase, CINAHL, APA PsycINFO, MEDLINE, and Web of Science. The inclusion criteria will encompass peer-reviewed English-language studies published from 2005 to 2025, focusing on the effects of occupational interventions designed to improve workplace mental health. The results will support work participation among working adults. DISCUSSION: The review will examine the effects of current occupational interventions on workers' mental health and well-being, as well as on work-related outcomes (e.g., work participation, productivity). The review results can inform researchers designing future studies assessing the effectiveness of occupational interventions on mental health and guide the development of new interventions.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(7)
University Health Network (CA), Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), University of Toronto (CA), University of Regina (CA), Krembil Research Institute
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Workplace Health and Well-being
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.