Input-Supported Population Regulation of an Attractor Registry: Formation, Pruning, and a Two-Factor Substrate Boundary in ADAM, an Online Cognitive Runtime

This paper tests whether an online cognitive runtime can grow and shrink its own attractor memory registry under structured experience, and whether those registry changes reach downstream behavior. Across three experimental protocols with 30 matched seeds each, structured exposure to a coherent target prompt family produces target-provenance mature attractors in 29/30 seeds (paired Wilcoxon p ≈ 6.44e-7), independent of temporal adjacency. Formation is bounded by a two-factor substrate condition: within-family trajectory coherence is the primary gate, and a theory-critical 0/30 fail family rules out a single-axis substrate-separation account. Formed memories persist under continued exposure (0/30 pruned) and are pruned under starvation (29/30; p ≈ 6.44e-7). The pruning pathway is lifecycle death from passive stability decay — tracked-target inactive-archive events never occur, and the ecology toggle produces identical tracked-target pruning counts (30/30). A within-subject causal ablation shows that suppressing formed target memories changes the cognitive field state (14/14) and safety logit (14/14, mean Δℓ = +5.00), while 16/16 seeds without such memories show exactly zero effect — an integrity check built into the design-frozen protocol. These findings show that an attractor-based cognitive runtime can grow, regulate, and functionally employ a memory population under controlled experience streams: the registry changes with structured input, is pruned under unsupported absence, and shifts downstream computation when directly perturbed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21523120
Primary Topic
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Input-Supported Population Regulation of an Attractor Registry: Formation, Pruning, and a Two-Factor Substrate Boundary in ADAM, an Online Cognitive Runtime

Yao‐Sheng Chen
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
preprint

Input-Supported Population Regulation of an Attractor Registry: Formation, Pruning, and a Two-Factor Substrate Boundary in ADAM, an Online Cognitive Runtime

Yao‐Sheng Chen
preprint en

Abstract

This paper tests whether an online cognitive runtime can grow and shrink its own attractor memory registry under structured experience, and whether those registry changes reach downstream behavior. Across three experimental protocols with 30 matched seeds each, structured exposure to a coherent target prompt family produces target-provenance mature attractors in 29/30 seeds (paired Wilcoxon p ≈ 6.44e-7), independent of temporal adjacency. Formation is bounded by a two-factor substrate condition: within-family trajectory coherence is the primary gate, and a theory-critical 0/30 fail family rules out a single-axis substrate-separation account. Formed memories persist under continued exposure (0/30 pruned) and are pruned under starvation (29/30; p ≈ 6.44e-7). The pruning pathway is lifecycle death from passive stability decay — tracked-target inactive-archive events never occur, and the ecology toggle produces identical tracked-target pruning counts (30/30). A within-subject causal ablation shows that suppressing formed target memories changes the cognitive field state (14/14) and safety logit (14/14, mean Δℓ = +5.00), while 16/16 seeds without such memories show exactly zero effect — an integrity check built into the design-frozen protocol. These findings show that an attractor-based cognitive runtime can grow, regulate, and functionally employ a memory population under controlled experience streams: the registry changes with structured input, is pruned under unsupported absence, and shifts downstream computation when directly perturbed.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cognitive Research (United States) (US)
Life in Land
Memory and Neural Mechanisms
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.