Pigs rely on spatial rather than numerical cues in an ordinal foraging task

Animals master various numerical tasks. Among numerical abilities, ordinality enables animals to identify an item on the basis of its position in a sequence (e.g. selecting the second out of six), a skill crucial for navigation, documented in species such as domestic chicks, fish and honey bees. Domestic pigs, Sus scrofa domesticus , exhibit advanced spatial and navigation skills. However, their ability to use ordinal information remains largely unexplored. Here, we trained 16 free-ranging Kune Kune pigs in an ordinal task. Seven pigs learned to select the second, and nine pigs the fifth bowl in a sagittal sequence of six identical bowls. When the sequence displacement was identical to the training one (sagittal test), both groups significantly preferred the previously reinforced bowl in the absence of visual or odour cues. When the distances between the bowls were manipulated, so that the ordinally correct and the spatially correct bowl did not coincide (ordinal–spatial incongruence test), pigs relied on spatial cues. Some individuals potentially relied on ordinality, suggesting that pigs can use ordinal information even though spatial information use predominates. When the sequence was rotated by 90°, so that it was oriented frontoparallel with respect to the pig's starting position (frontoparallel test), both groups preferentially approached the second bowl on the right side of the arena, hinting at hemispheric specialization for food-related and/or spatial tasks. Future studies should follow up on the relevance of, and preference for, numerical and spatial cues in pigs as well as on the origins of pigs' right-side preference in ordinal foraging tasks.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Animal Behaviour
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anbehav.2026.123666
Primary Topic
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pigs rely on spatial rather than numerical cues in an ordinal foraging task

Ariane Veit, Marianne Wondrak, Rosa Rugani, Kimberly Brosche
Animal Behaviour
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
article

Pigs rely on spatial rather than numerical cues in an ordinal foraging task

Ariane Veit, Marianne Wondrak, Rosa Rugani, Kimberly Brosche
article en

Abstract

Animals master various numerical tasks. Among numerical abilities, ordinality enables animals to identify an item on the basis of its position in a sequence (e.g. selecting the second out of six), a skill crucial for navigation, documented in species such as domestic chicks, fish and honey bees. Domestic pigs, Sus scrofa domesticus , exhibit advanced spatial and navigation skills. However, their ability to use ordinal information remains largely unexplored. Here, we trained 16 free-ranging Kune Kune pigs in an ordinal task. Seven pigs learned to select the second, and nine pigs the fifth bowl in a sagittal sequence of six identical bowls. When the sequence displacement was identical to the training one (sagittal test), both groups significantly preferred the previously reinforced bowl in the absence of visual or odour cues. When the distances between the bowls were manipulated, so that the ordinally correct and the spatially correct bowl did not coincide (ordinal–spatial incongruence test), pigs relied on spatial cues. Some individuals potentially relied on ordinality, suggesting that pigs can use ordinal information even though spatial information use predominates. When the sequence was rotated by 90°, so that it was oriented frontoparallel with respect to the pig's starting position (frontoparallel test), both groups preferentially approached the second bowl on the right side of the arena, hinting at hemispheric specialization for food-related and/or spatial tasks. Future studies should follow up on the relevance of, and preference for, numerical and spatial cues in pigs as well as on the origins of pigs' right-side preference in ordinal foraging tasks.

Animal BehaviourVol. 239
University of Padua (IT), University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna (AT), AEE Institute for Sustainable Technologies (AT), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Ministero dell'Istruzione e del Merito
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Animal Behavior and Welfare Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.