Interpretable Machine Learning for Biomass Pyrolysis: Multi-Product Yield Prediction and Descriptor Prioritization for Bio-Oil, Syngas, and Biochar

Biomass pyrolysis produces three major product fractions—bio-oil, syngas, and biochar—whose yields are governed by nonlinear interactions among feedstock composition, catalyst properties, and operating conditions. Accurate prediction of these product yields remains challenging because literature-derived pyrolysis data are heterogeneous and unevenly distributed across the experimental space. In this study, an interpretable machine-learning framework was developed to predict biomass pyrolysis product yields using readily accessible descriptors from proximate/ultimate analysis, catalyst characterization, and process operation. A curated dataset containing 297 experimental records and 14 input descriptors was used to benchmark multiple regression algorithms, including linear and regularized linear models, support vector regression, k-nearest-neighbour regression, Random Forest, Extra Trees, gradient boosting regression trees, XGBoost, and CatBoost. Target-specific models were developed for bio-oil, syngas, and biochar to maximize the use of available yield data without imputing missing target values. The results showed that nonlinear tree-based ensembles outperform linear and distance-based approaches, while the optimal model depends on the product fraction. SHAP and feature-importance analyses further reveal distinct descriptor–yield relationships. Bio-oil prediction is mainly influenced by catalyst acidity, BET surface area, volatile matter, ash content, and temperature; syngas prediction is dominated by temperature and feedstock composition; and biochar prediction is strongly associated with heating rate, residence time, ash, fixed carbon, and oxygen content. This work provides a transparent data-driven tool for product-yield prediction and descriptor prioritization in biomass pyrolysis. The results showed that nonlinear tree-based ensembles consistently outperformed linear and distance-based approaches. On the independent test set, XGBoost achieved R2 = 0.834, RMSE = 5.503 wt%, and MAE = 4.371 wt% for bio-oil, and R2 = 0.790, RMSE = 5.427 wt%, and MAE = 3.791 wt% for syngas. GBRT achieved R2 = 0.739, RMSE = 3.966 wt%, and MAE = 2.706 wt% for biochar. Repeated five-fold cross-validation further produced mean R2 values of 0.783, 0.698, and 0.745 for bio-oil, syngas, and biochar, respectively.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Catalysts
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/catal16080670
Primary Topic
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Interpretable Machine Learning for Biomass Pyrolysis: Multi-Product Yield Prediction and Descriptor Prioritization for Bio-Oil, Syngas, and Biochar

Muhammad Imran Din, Fiaz Hussaın, Wajahat Waheed Kazmi, Farooq Ahmad et al.
Catalysts
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
article

Interpretable Machine Learning for Biomass Pyrolysis: Multi-Product Yield Prediction and Descriptor Prioritization for Bio-Oil, Syngas, and Biochar

Muhammad Imran Din, Fiaz Hussaın, Wajahat Waheed Kazmi, Farooq Ahmad, Shagufta Zafar, Faysal M. Al-Khulaifi, Hira
article en

Abstract

Biomass pyrolysis produces three major product fractions—bio-oil, syngas, and biochar—whose yields are governed by nonlinear interactions among feedstock composition, catalyst properties, and operating conditions. Accurate prediction of these product yields remains challenging because literature-derived pyrolysis data are heterogeneous and unevenly distributed across the experimental space. In this study, an interpretable machine-learning framework was developed to predict biomass pyrolysis product yields using readily accessible descriptors from proximate/ultimate analysis, catalyst characterization, and process operation. A curated dataset containing 297 experimental records and 14 input descriptors was used to benchmark multiple regression algorithms, including linear and regularized linear models, support vector regression, k-nearest-neighbour regression, Random Forest, Extra Trees, gradient boosting regression trees, XGBoost, and CatBoost. Target-specific models were developed for bio-oil, syngas, and biochar to maximize the use of available yield data without imputing missing target values. The results showed that nonlinear tree-based ensembles outperform linear and distance-based approaches, while the optimal model depends on the product fraction. SHAP and feature-importance analyses further reveal distinct descriptor–yield relationships. Bio-oil prediction is mainly influenced by catalyst acidity, BET surface area, volatile matter, ash content, and temperature; syngas prediction is dominated by temperature and feedstock composition; and biochar prediction is strongly associated with heating rate, residence time, ash, fixed carbon, and oxygen content. This work provides a transparent data-driven tool for product-yield prediction and descriptor prioritization in biomass pyrolysis. The results showed that nonlinear tree-based ensembles consistently outperformed linear and distance-based approaches. On the independent test set, XGBoost achieved R2 = 0.834, RMSE = 5.503 wt%, and MAE = 4.371 wt% for bio-oil, and R2 = 0.790, RMSE = 5.427 wt%, and MAE = 3.791 wt% for syngas. GBRT achieved R2 = 0.739, RMSE = 3.966 wt%, and MAE = 2.706 wt% for biochar. Repeated five-fold cross-validation further produced mean R2 values of 0.783, 0.698, and 0.745 for bio-oil, syngas, and biochar, respectively.

CatalystsVol. 16(8)
Northern Border University (SA), Gachon University (KR), King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), University of the Punjab (PK), Government Sadiq College Women University (PK)
Northern Border University
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.