Effects of Pine Nut Shell Biochar Activation State, Particle Size, and Dose on Peat Substrate Properties and Arugula Microgreen Performance

ABSTRACT Background : Renewable peat‐reducing components are needed for horticultural substrates; however, the combined effects of biochar activation state, particle size, and dose on substrate function remain unresolved. Aim : This study evaluated the effects of pine nut shell biochar on peat substrate properties and arugula microgreen performance and identified screening‐level criteria for peat‐reduced substrate design. Methods : Peat was partially replaced by nonactivated or steam‐activated biochar at 10% or 20% (v/v) using fine (<30 µm) or large (2–10 mm) fractions. After 28 days, the substrate hydrophysical and chemical properties, extractable nutrients, mobile trace elements, germination, morphometric traits, and biomass were determined. Results : Steam activation significantly increased the biochar pH; electrical conductivity; surface area; and extractable K, Mg, Ca, and P contents. In the substrate, fine fractions improved the water‐holding capacity and total porosity, whereas activated large fractions reduced these properties. Nonactivated biochar lowered the substrate electrical conductivity relative to the peat control, whereas activated biochar markedly increased it. Potassium increased in all amended substrates, but phosphorus usually declined, except for a slight increase in the 10% fine activated treatment. The best plant response was obtained with 10% fine biochar. Fresh biomass was approximately 2.0–2.8‐fold higher than that in the peat control, whereas the 20% rate provided no additional benefit, and some activated‐biochar treatments reduced germination and growth. Mobile heavy metal concentrations remained low across all treatments. Conclusions : Under the tested conditions, 10% fine nonactivated pine nut shell biochar provided the best overall compromise between peat replacement, substrate performance, and manageable electrical conductivity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jpln.70101
Primary Topic
Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Pine Nut Shell Biochar Activation State, Particle Size, and Dose on Peat Substrate Properties and Arugula Microgreen Performance

Anastasia O. Levkina, Alexandra D. Ponomareva, Konstantin O. Ponomarev, Alina Dryagina et al.
Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
article

Effects of Pine Nut Shell Biochar Activation State, Particle Size, and Dose on Peat Substrate Properties and Arugula Microgreen Performance

Anastasia O. Levkina, Alexandra D. Ponomareva, Konstantin O. Ponomarev, Alina Dryagina, Ivan I. Shanenkov, Roman B. Tabakaev
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background : Renewable peat‐reducing components are needed for horticultural substrates; however, the combined effects of biochar activation state, particle size, and dose on substrate function remain unresolved. Aim : This study evaluated the effects of pine nut shell biochar on peat substrate properties and arugula microgreen performance and identified screening‐level criteria for peat‐reduced substrate design. Methods : Peat was partially replaced by nonactivated or steam‐activated biochar at 10% or 20% (v/v) using fine (<30 µm) or large (2–10 mm) fractions. After 28 days, the substrate hydrophysical and chemical properties, extractable nutrients, mobile trace elements, germination, morphometric traits, and biomass were determined. Results : Steam activation significantly increased the biochar pH; electrical conductivity; surface area; and extractable K, Mg, Ca, and P contents. In the substrate, fine fractions improved the water‐holding capacity and total porosity, whereas activated large fractions reduced these properties. Nonactivated biochar lowered the substrate electrical conductivity relative to the peat control, whereas activated biochar markedly increased it. Potassium increased in all amended substrates, but phosphorus usually declined, except for a slight increase in the 10% fine activated treatment. The best plant response was obtained with 10% fine biochar. Fresh biomass was approximately 2.0–2.8‐fold higher than that in the peat control, whereas the 20% rate provided no additional benefit, and some activated‐biochar treatments reduced germination and growth. Mobile heavy metal concentrations remained low across all treatments. Conclusions : Under the tested conditions, 10% fine nonactivated pine nut shell biochar provided the best overall compromise between peat replacement, substrate performance, and manageable electrical conductivity.

Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science
National Research Tomsk State University (RU), University of Tyumen (RU), Tomsk Polytechnic University (RU), Industrial University of Tyumen (RU)
Russian Science Foundation
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Composting and Vermicomposting Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.