A trait‐based integration of competition and abiotic tolerance underlies plant success

Summary Understanding what determines species' ecological success is a central challenge in ecology. Competitive ability and abiotic tolerance are expected to be strong predictors of species success, yet theory predicts a trade‐off between them. Since some traits are phylogenetically conserved whereas others are evolutionarily labile, species may have the potential to combine competitive ability with abiotic tolerance. We conducted a garden experiment involving 23 wetland species under two contrasting hydrological regimes and quantified performance measures to assess species responses to competition and abiotic conditions. We also measured structural, physiological, and morphological traits, and related both to species success, quantified as realized niche breadth and local dominance across 19 000 vegetation plots. Niche breadth and local dominance were most strongly associated with competitive effect, and to a lesser extent with abiotic tolerance. The most successful species expressed traits associated with a phylogenetically conservative persistence–stature functional dimension (high LDMC, tall stature, and deep roots) together with traits of evolutionarily labile acquisitive physiology (low δ 13 C, high stomatal conductance, and elevated leaf nitrogen), indicating high gas exchange and sustained carbon acquisition while trading off rapid growth. Our findings show that competitive strength and abiotic tolerance can co‐occur, helping explain why certain evolutionary lineages dominate wetlands.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Phytologist
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/nph.71465
Primary Topic
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A trait‐based integration of competition and abiotic tolerance underlies plant success

Jiří Květoň, Anežka Holeštová, Jan Häusler, Jan Douda et al.
New Phytologist
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
article

A trait‐based integration of competition and abiotic tolerance underlies plant success

Jiří Květoň, Anežka Holeštová, Jan Häusler, Jan Douda, Alena Havrdová, Jana Doudová, Přemysl Král, Leandro Eusebio
article en

Abstract

Summary Understanding what determines species' ecological success is a central challenge in ecology. Competitive ability and abiotic tolerance are expected to be strong predictors of species success, yet theory predicts a trade‐off between them. Since some traits are phylogenetically conserved whereas others are evolutionarily labile, species may have the potential to combine competitive ability with abiotic tolerance. We conducted a garden experiment involving 23 wetland species under two contrasting hydrological regimes and quantified performance measures to assess species responses to competition and abiotic conditions. We also measured structural, physiological, and morphological traits, and related both to species success, quantified as realized niche breadth and local dominance across 19 000 vegetation plots. Niche breadth and local dominance were most strongly associated with competitive effect, and to a lesser extent with abiotic tolerance. The most successful species expressed traits associated with a phylogenetically conservative persistence–stature functional dimension (high LDMC, tall stature, and deep roots) together with traits of evolutionarily labile acquisitive physiology (low δ 13 C, high stomatal conductance, and elevated leaf nitrogen), indicating high gas exchange and sustained carbon acquisition while trading off rapid growth. Our findings show that competitive strength and abiotic tolerance can co‐occur, helping explain why certain evolutionary lineages dominate wetlands.

New Phytologist
Czech University of Life Sciences Prague (CZ), University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice (CZ)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.