Blinded‐Into‐Unblinded Interim Analyses for Clinical Trials With Time‐to‐Event Endpoints

A large proportion of clinical trials do not meet their recruitment targets. Trials using time-to-event endpoints come along with the additional complexity that the amount of available information depends on the number of observed events, which is random for a specified point in time. This means that even if a trial may have recruited the planned number of patients in its recruitment interval, the amount of available information at a fixed calendar time is random. The determination of the sample size underlying a clinical trial is a very important aspect when designing a trial. When adaptations of the pre-specified sample size are a desired design option to address the uncertainty of underlying assumptions, blinded interim analyses are recommended by the authorities. However, blinding cannot be assured when there is a high interest in a potential early trial stop or a high uncertainty about the underlying effect size. In those situations, (adaptive) group-sequential trial designs may be used. In this work, we propose a flexible, hybrid approach. Based on the chances of an early trial stop, either a blinded or an unblinded interim analysis is conducted such that the advantages of the two commonly applied approaches are combined. We focus on trials where the time to an event is the primary outcome. These studies usually come along with a long study duration, where the necessity of design adaptations may be especially appealing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biometrical Journal
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/bimj.70151
Primary Topic
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Blinded‐Into‐Unblinded Interim Analyses for Clinical Trials With Time‐to‐Event Endpoints

Björn Bokelmann, Jan Meis, Meinhard Kieser, Stephen Schüürhuis et al.
Biometrical Journal
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
article

Blinded‐Into‐Unblinded Interim Analyses for Clinical Trials With Time‐to‐Event Endpoints

Björn Bokelmann, Jan Meis, Meinhard Kieser, Stephen Schüürhuis, Carolin Herrmann
article en

Abstract

A large proportion of clinical trials do not meet their recruitment targets. Trials using time-to-event endpoints come along with the additional complexity that the amount of available information depends on the number of observed events, which is random for a specified point in time. This means that even if a trial may have recruited the planned number of patients in its recruitment interval, the amount of available information at a fixed calendar time is random. The determination of the sample size underlying a clinical trial is a very important aspect when designing a trial. When adaptations of the pre-specified sample size are a desired design option to address the uncertainty of underlying assumptions, blinded interim analyses are recommended by the authorities. However, blinding cannot be assured when there is a high interest in a potential early trial stop or a high uncertainty about the underlying effect size. In those situations, (adaptive) group-sequential trial designs may be used. In this work, we propose a flexible, hybrid approach. Based on the chances of an early trial stop, either a blinded or an unblinded interim analysis is conducted such that the advantages of the two commonly applied approaches are combined. We focus on trials where the time to an event is the primary outcome. These studies usually come along with a long study duration, where the necessity of design adaptations may be especially appealing.

Biometrical JournalVol. 68(4)
Heidelberg University (DE), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Zimmer Biomet (Germany) (DE), Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.