Differences in midwifery practical competence during parturitional period based on possessing of Japanese ‘advanced midwives’ certification: A nationwide multicenter questionnaire survey

There are no established indicators for objectively evaluating ‘Midwifery Practice Competency During the Parturitional Period (MPC-PP)’ among Japanese midwives. Japan has implemented the ‘Clinical Ladder of Competencies for Midwifery Practice (CLoCMiP)’ Level III certification system for Advanced Midwives. This study aims to clarify differences in MPC-PP based on possession of CLoCMiP Level III certification. A self-administered questionnaire comprising 35 items using the ‘Self-Assessment Scale for MPC-PP’ was administered in 2023 among 745 midwives with at least 6 year of experience in 78 Japanese hospitals that treated vaginal births in Japan. Based on certification status, participants were classified into three groups: 386 midwives who had not yet applied (51.8%) in the unapplied group, 59 midwives who had chosen not to renew (7.9%) in the non-renewed group and 300 midwives (40.3%) in the certified group. The median overall score on the ‘Self- Assessment Scale for MPC-PP’ (35–210 points) was significantly higher in the certified group (185 points) than the unapplied (177 points) and non-renewed (179 points) groups. Certified midwives scored higher in multivariate analysis (cut-off score: 178 points; odds ratio: 1.92). In conclusion, supporting midwives in obtaining and renewing CLoCMiP Level III certification may enhance their MPC-PP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-62263-2
Primary Topic
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differences in midwifery practical competence during parturitional period based on possessing of Japanese ‘advanced midwives’ certification: A nationwide multicenter questionnaire survey

Toshiko Fukui, Mamoru Morikawa, Yuki Morikawa
Scientific Reports
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
article

Differences in midwifery practical competence during parturitional period based on possessing of Japanese ‘advanced midwives’ certification: A nationwide multicenter questionnaire survey

Toshiko Fukui, Mamoru Morikawa, Yuki Morikawa
article en

Abstract

There are no established indicators for objectively evaluating ‘Midwifery Practice Competency During the Parturitional Period (MPC-PP)’ among Japanese midwives. Japan has implemented the ‘Clinical Ladder of Competencies for Midwifery Practice (CLoCMiP)’ Level III certification system for Advanced Midwives. This study aims to clarify differences in MPC-PP based on possession of CLoCMiP Level III certification. A self-administered questionnaire comprising 35 items using the ‘Self-Assessment Scale for MPC-PP’ was administered in 2023 among 745 midwives with at least 6 year of experience in 78 Japanese hospitals that treated vaginal births in Japan. Based on certification status, participants were classified into three groups: 386 midwives who had not yet applied (51.8%) in the unapplied group, 59 midwives who had chosen not to renew (7.9%) in the non-renewed group and 300 midwives (40.3%) in the certified group. The median overall score on the ‘Self- Assessment Scale for MPC-PP’ (35–210 points) was significantly higher in the certified group (185 points) than the unapplied (177 points) and non-renewed (179 points) groups. Certified midwives scored higher in multivariate analysis (cut-off score: 178 points; odds ratio: 1.92). In conclusion, supporting midwives in obtaining and renewing CLoCMiP Level III certification may enhance their MPC-PP.

Scientific Reports
Kansai Medical University (JP), Inpex (Japan) (JP), International University of Health and Welfare (JP)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.