Governing vulnerability through ambivalence: Support measures for migrant domestic workers in and beyond crises

This article examines how ambivalence shapes social policies for vulnerabilised populations, based on an analysis of support measures for migrant domestic workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. Drawing on interviews with policymakers, civil society actors, and domestic workers, we identify three key dimensions of ambivalence: the conditionality of support, its short-term nature, and the risks and uncertainties entailed. We argue that this ambivalence is not unique to the pandemic but reflects a broader pattern of governance. In this way, the vulnerability of domestic workers is limited yet sustained, rendering them a reliable workforce within the domestic care sector. Our study contributes to an intersectional understanding of welfare governance, highlighting its growing entanglement with migration control and its role in reproducing, rather than reducing, social inequalities.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Critical Social Policy
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/02610183261452534
Primary Topic
Migration and Labor Dynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Governing vulnerability through ambivalence: Support measures for migrant domestic workers in and beyond crises

Christina Mittmasser, Myrian Carbajal, Milena Chimienti, Emma Gauttier
Critical Social Policy
Migration and Labor Dynamics
article

Governing vulnerability through ambivalence: Support measures for migrant domestic workers in and beyond crises

Christina Mittmasser, Myrian Carbajal, Milena Chimienti, Emma Gauttier
article en

Abstract

This article examines how ambivalence shapes social policies for vulnerabilised populations, based on an analysis of support measures for migrant domestic workers during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. Drawing on interviews with policymakers, civil society actors, and domestic workers, we identify three key dimensions of ambivalence: the conditionality of support, its short-term nature, and the risks and uncertainties entailed. We argue that this ambivalence is not unique to the pandemic but reflects a broader pattern of governance. In this way, the vulnerability of domestic workers is limited yet sustained, rendering them a reliable workforce within the domestic care sector. Our study contributes to an intersectional understanding of welfare governance, highlighting its growing entanglement with migration control and its role in reproducing, rather than reducing, social inequalities.

Critical Social Policy
HES-SO University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland (CH), HES-SO Fribourg (CH)
Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Migration and Labor Dynamics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.