Revisiting the Role of the Channel Implant in Late and Revision Orbital Fractures

OBJECTIVE: To revisit the role of the porous polyethylene channel implant (PPCI) in consecutive patients with late or revision orbital floor fractures. METHODS: A retrospective, institutional review board-approved chart review was performed, encompassing all consecutive patients who underwent PPCI implantation over an 18-year period (2007-2025). Demographic data and clinical examination findings were systematically documented. Selected cases included patients with: (1) late (≥1 year) orbital fractures and (2) revision orbital fractures with complicated hardware. Anophthalmic patients with late (neglected) orbital fractures or with extensive bony loss were not excluded. RESULTS: Sixteen orbits in 15 patients (12 males, 3 females; mean age, 30 years) met the inclusion criteria. Eleven late fractures (68.75%) underwent primary repair with PPCI, while 5 orbits (31.25%) underwent revision surgery following complicated titanium or patient-specific implants. The mean interval between trauma and PPCI placement was 15.2 months, and this interval was significantly shorter in revision fractures (6.2 months) compared with late fractures (17.4 months, p < 0.0001). Overall, all patients experienced improvement in enophthalmos and hypoglobus, despite incomplete availability of quantitative measurements across the cohort. Four PPCI designs were used, with follow-up averaging 23.3 months. Enophthalmos improved from 3.875 mm to 1.5 mm, and diplopia resolved in 62.5% of patients. Intraoperative complications included linear fissure fractures of the PPCI (n = 2), which occurred during attempts to contour the device to accommodate a combined orbital floor and medial wall defect, and fracture (fishmouthing) of the PPCI channel entry (n = 3). Postoperative complications included palpable screws (n = 2), permanent hyperglobus (n = 1), and recurrent enophthalmos (n = 1). CONCLUSION: In selected patients, the PPCI provides a simple all-in-one solution with adequate volume restoration and relatively few complications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/iop.0000000000003237
Primary Topic
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting the Role of the Channel Implant in Late and Revision Orbital Fractures

Omar Amro El Houssieny, Hatem A. Tawfik, Farah Elwakil
Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
article

Revisiting the Role of the Channel Implant in Late and Revision Orbital Fractures

Omar Amro El Houssieny, Hatem A. Tawfik, Farah Elwakil
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To revisit the role of the porous polyethylene channel implant (PPCI) in consecutive patients with late or revision orbital floor fractures. METHODS: A retrospective, institutional review board-approved chart review was performed, encompassing all consecutive patients who underwent PPCI implantation over an 18-year period (2007-2025). Demographic data and clinical examination findings were systematically documented. Selected cases included patients with: (1) late (≥1 year) orbital fractures and (2) revision orbital fractures with complicated hardware. Anophthalmic patients with late (neglected) orbital fractures or with extensive bony loss were not excluded. RESULTS: Sixteen orbits in 15 patients (12 males, 3 females; mean age, 30 years) met the inclusion criteria. Eleven late fractures (68.75%) underwent primary repair with PPCI, while 5 orbits (31.25%) underwent revision surgery following complicated titanium or patient-specific implants. The mean interval between trauma and PPCI placement was 15.2 months, and this interval was significantly shorter in revision fractures (6.2 months) compared with late fractures (17.4 months, p < 0.0001). Overall, all patients experienced improvement in enophthalmos and hypoglobus, despite incomplete availability of quantitative measurements across the cohort. Four PPCI designs were used, with follow-up averaging 23.3 months. Enophthalmos improved from 3.875 mm to 1.5 mm, and diplopia resolved in 62.5% of patients. Intraoperative complications included linear fissure fractures of the PPCI (n = 2), which occurred during attempts to contour the device to accommodate a combined orbital floor and medial wall defect, and fracture (fishmouthing) of the PPCI channel entry (n = 3). Postoperative complications included palpable screws (n = 2), permanent hyperglobus (n = 1), and recurrent enophthalmos (n = 1). CONCLUSION: In selected patients, the PPCI provides a simple all-in-one solution with adequate volume restoration and relatively few complications.

Ophthalmic Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
Ain Shams University (EG), William Harvey Hospital (GB)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Facial Trauma and Fracture Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.