EXPRESS: Tools-in-Process: How Material Transitions Reconstitute Knowledge in Strategy Work

Strategy-making increasingly depends on integrating knowledge across functional and hierarchical boundaries, often through processes mediated by material artifacts. While research shows that the material properties of individual artifacts partly shape what can be known, discussed, and decided, less is known about knowledge integration during moments when a structured strategy tool moves it through materially distinct artifacts. Drawing on an ethnographic study of two strategic roadmapping projects in a large organization, we examine how transitions between artifact forms shape knowledge integration. We identify four artifact types, ephemeral, interim, stabilized, and analytical, and the transitions between materially distinct forms during which knowledge is reconstituted rather than simply carried forward. Across both projects, we identify three dynamics during these transitions: selection, surfacing, and reconfiguration. We contribute by identifying reconstitution as a knowledge-integration mechanism and by offering a tools-in-process account of how structured strategy tools work through transitions between artifact forms over time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategic Organization
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14761270261472409
Primary Topic
Innovation and Knowledge Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

EXPRESS: Tools-in-Process: How Material Transitions Reconstitute Knowledge in Strategy Work

Elisabeth Krull, Smith Pf, Kenneth Husted
Strategic Organization
Innovation and Knowledge Management
article

EXPRESS: Tools-in-Process: How Material Transitions Reconstitute Knowledge in Strategy Work

Elisabeth Krull, Smith Pf, Kenneth Husted
article en

Abstract

Strategy-making increasingly depends on integrating knowledge across functional and hierarchical boundaries, often through processes mediated by material artifacts. While research shows that the material properties of individual artifacts partly shape what can be known, discussed, and decided, less is known about knowledge integration during moments when a structured strategy tool moves it through materially distinct artifacts. Drawing on an ethnographic study of two strategic roadmapping projects in a large organization, we examine how transitions between artifact forms shape knowledge integration. We identify four artifact types, ephemeral, interim, stabilized, and analytical, and the transitions between materially distinct forms during which knowledge is reconstituted rather than simply carried forward. Across both projects, we identify three dynamics during these transitions: selection, surfacing, and reconfiguration. We contribute by identifying reconstitution as a knowledge-integration mechanism and by offering a tools-in-process account of how structured strategy tools work through transitions between artifact forms over time.

Strategic Organization
University of Auckland (NZ), University of Manchester (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Innovation and Knowledge Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

EXPRESS: Tools-in-Process: How Material Transitions Reconstitute Knowledge in Strategy Work — Elisabeth Krull, Smith Pf, et al. · Strategic Organization (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS