Street‐Level Bureaucrats and Frames of Deservingness: How Client Categorisations Shape the Implementation of Ghana's LEAP Cash Transfer Programme

ABSTRACT Drawing on Lipsky's theory of street‐level bureaucracy, this study explores how frontline workers' discretionary judgements influence Ghana's Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) cash transfer programme. Using van Oorschot's CARIN framework of deservingness ( Control, Attitude, Reciprocity, Identity and Need ), this study examines how administrators and community actors categorise clients. Based on in‐depth interviews, findings reveal that officials prioritise Control, Attitude and Need , favouring clients perceived as grateful, genuinely needy and lacking control over their circumstances. These subjective frames exclude some eligible beneficiaries, demonstrating how deservingness judgements can reinforce inequality and emphasising the need for training and clearer operational guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of International Development
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jid.70110
Primary Topic
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Street‐Level Bureaucrats and Frames of Deservingness: How Client Categorisations Shape the Implementation of Ghana's LEAP Cash Transfer Programme

Abdul‐Rahim Mohammed
Journal of International Development
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
article

Street‐Level Bureaucrats and Frames of Deservingness: How Client Categorisations Shape the Implementation of Ghana's LEAP Cash Transfer Programme

Abdul‐Rahim Mohammed
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Drawing on Lipsky's theory of street‐level bureaucracy, this study explores how frontline workers' discretionary judgements influence Ghana's Livelihood Empowerment Against Poverty (LEAP) cash transfer programme. Using van Oorschot's CARIN framework of deservingness ( Control, Attitude, Reciprocity, Identity and Need ), this study examines how administrators and community actors categorise clients. Based on in‐depth interviews, findings reveal that officials prioritise Control, Attitude and Need , favouring clients perceived as grateful, genuinely needy and lacking control over their circumstances. These subjective frames exclude some eligible beneficiaries, demonstrating how deservingness judgements can reinforce inequality and emphasising the need for training and clearer operational guidelines.

Journal of International Development
University for Development Studies (GH)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.