Making Words Count: Computational Linguistics in Management Research

In recent years, a rapidly growing number of management scholars are using computational linguistics (CL) to analyze vast corpora of naturally occurring organizational language. Yet the rapid adoption of CL methods has outpaced the development of shared standards for linking theoretical constructs, linguistic data, and computational measurement. We synthesize 353 articles published in leading management journals for 2013–2025, identifying four recurring challenges shaping the credibility of CL-based research: misalignment between constructs and textual corpora, unnecessary model complexity, the opacity of large language model workflows, and insufficient transparency in reporting. Building on these patterns, we develop four integrative design principles—construct-language fit, minimal sufficient complexity, LLM sensitivity and auditability, and disclosure-as-assessability—and identify key research implications that reposition CL as a theoretically consequential lens for management scholarship.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063261465289
Primary Topic
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Making Words Count: Computational Linguistics in Management Research

Daniel J. Beal, Judy Rady, David M. Townsend, Elham Asgari et al.
Journal of Management
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
article

Making Words Count: Computational Linguistics in Management Research

Daniel J. Beal, Judy Rady, David M. Townsend, Elham Asgari, Joseph Simpson, Richard A. Hunt, Mohammad Rady
article en

Abstract

In recent years, a rapidly growing number of management scholars are using computational linguistics (CL) to analyze vast corpora of naturally occurring organizational language. Yet the rapid adoption of CL methods has outpaced the development of shared standards for linking theoretical constructs, linguistic data, and computational measurement. We synthesize 353 articles published in leading management journals for 2013–2025, identifying four recurring challenges shaping the credibility of CL-based research: misalignment between constructs and textual corpora, unnecessary model complexity, the opacity of large language model workflows, and insufficient transparency in reporting. Building on these patterns, we develop four integrative design principles—construct-language fit, minimal sufficient complexity, LLM sensitivity and auditability, and disclosure-as-assessability—and identify key research implications that reposition CL as a theoretically consequential lens for management scholarship.

Journal of Management
Michigan Technological University (US), University of Kansas (US), The University of Texas Rio Grande Valley (US), Virginia Tech (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Computational and Text Analysis Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.