Unmasking Malignancy in Dense Breast Tissue (American College of Radiology Types C and D): A Biopsy-Proven Analysis of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Performance, Clinical Decision Dynamics, and Correlation with Histological Grade and Molecular Subtype

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and clinical decision-making impact of adding digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to two-dimensional digital mammography (2D DM) in a 100% biopsy-proven cohort of women with dense breast parenchyma (ACR types C and D), focusing on the relationship between tumor biology and radiologic conspicuity. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 123 women (mean age 46.7 ± 9.9 years) with ACR type C (n = 67) or D (n = 56) breast density who underwent sequential 2D DM and DBT imaging, all with definitive histopathology (malignant, n = 78; high-risk, n = 8; benign, n = 37). A single expert radiologist performed independent readings of 2D DM alone and then the combined 2D DM + DBT dataset after a 4-week washout. Outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, PPV/NPV, lesion visibility (0–5 scale), and BI-RADS upgrade rate. Results: 2D DM + DBT significantly outperformed 2D DM alone in sensitivity (97.4% vs. 69.2%; p < 0.000001) and NPV (93.1% vs. 57.1%), with AUC improving from 0.727 to 0.922 (p < 0.001). Mean lesion visibility increased from 2.94 ± 1.19 to 4.52 ± 0.78 (p < 0.0001), with the largest gains for architectural distortion (100% sensitivity) and, notably, for Grade 1 tumors (delta +1.90), which reached the highest DBT visibility of any grade. Major BI-RADS upgrades occurred in 27 cases (22.0%; upgrade PPV 88.9%). Conclusions: In this biopsy-enriched ACR C/D cohort, adding DBT to 2D DM was diagnostically superior across all metrics. The disproportionate visibility gain for Grade 1 tumors is a hypothesis-generating finding relevant to the overdiagnosis debate, not proof that DBT reduces overdiagnosis. These findings support DBT as a valuable adjunct to 2D DM in dense breasts, pending prospective, multi-reader validation in unselected populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diagnostics
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics16152321
Primary Topic
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unmasking Malignancy in Dense Breast Tissue (American College of Radiology Types C and D): A Biopsy-Proven Analysis of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Performance, Clinical Decision Dynamics, and Correlation with Histological Grade and Molecular Subtype

Ferhat Özden, Emrah Karatay, Abdülkadir Eren
Diagnostics
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
article

Unmasking Malignancy in Dense Breast Tissue (American College of Radiology Types C and D): A Biopsy-Proven Analysis of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Performance, Clinical Decision Dynamics, and Correlation with Histological Grade and Molecular Subtype

Ferhat Özden, Emrah Karatay, Abdülkadir Eren
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance and clinical decision-making impact of adding digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT) to two-dimensional digital mammography (2D DM) in a 100% biopsy-proven cohort of women with dense breast parenchyma (ACR types C and D), focusing on the relationship between tumor biology and radiologic conspicuity. Methods: This retrospective study analyzed 123 women (mean age 46.7 ± 9.9 years) with ACR type C (n = 67) or D (n = 56) breast density who underwent sequential 2D DM and DBT imaging, all with definitive histopathology (malignant, n = 78; high-risk, n = 8; benign, n = 37). A single expert radiologist performed independent readings of 2D DM alone and then the combined 2D DM + DBT dataset after a 4-week washout. Outcomes included sensitivity, specificity, PPV/NPV, lesion visibility (0–5 scale), and BI-RADS upgrade rate. Results: 2D DM + DBT significantly outperformed 2D DM alone in sensitivity (97.4% vs. 69.2%; p < 0.000001) and NPV (93.1% vs. 57.1%), with AUC improving from 0.727 to 0.922 (p < 0.001). Mean lesion visibility increased from 2.94 ± 1.19 to 4.52 ± 0.78 (p < 0.0001), with the largest gains for architectural distortion (100% sensitivity) and, notably, for Grade 1 tumors (delta +1.90), which reached the highest DBT visibility of any grade. Major BI-RADS upgrades occurred in 27 cases (22.0%; upgrade PPV 88.9%). Conclusions: In this biopsy-enriched ACR C/D cohort, adding DBT to 2D DM was diagnostically superior across all metrics. The disproportionate visibility gain for Grade 1 tumors is a hypothesis-generating finding relevant to the overdiagnosis debate, not proof that DBT reduces overdiagnosis. These findings support DBT as a valuable adjunct to 2D DM in dense breasts, pending prospective, multi-reader validation in unselected populations.

DiagnosticsVol. 16(15)
Istanbul Medipol University (TR), İstanbul Kanuni Sultan Süleyman Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Digital Radiography and Breast Imaging
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.