Total Biomass in the Neotropical Savanna Domain: Stock Estimation and Modeling with Edaphic Variables

In the Neotropical Savanna domain, few equations are available for estimating biomass stocks in Cerrado sensu stricto (CSS), despite the importance of such tools for estimating carbon stocks, understanding ecosystem functioning, and supporting conservation actions. We conducted forest inventories in 40 temporary 1000 m2 plots in southeastern Brazil to estimate total and compartmental biomass stocks and to model biomass using structural and edaphic predictors. Total biomass (TB) included aboveground woody biomass (AGWB), necromass, litter, and belowground biomass (BGB). AGWB was estimated for trees with basal diameter ≥ 5 cm using a previously fitted regional equation. Root biomass was sampled using a 1 m3 trench excavated at a single point adjacent to each plot. Necromass was quantified using the line-intersect method along a 50 m transect, considering debris with diameter ≥ 3 cm. Litter was sampled using a 0.25 m2 frame placed at the center of each plot. Biomass was modeled on an area basis using a hierarchical approach for TB, total tree biomass (TTB = AGWB + BGB), and AGWB. Mean stocks (Mg ha−1 ± s.d.) were 45.24 ± 17.32 (TB), 20.47 ± 11.26 (AGWB), 18.47 ± 10.88 (BGB), 5.49 ± 4.18 (litter), and 0.81 ± 1.62 (necromass). Models selected using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and validated by repeated k-fold cross-validation achieved rŷy = 0.76, 0.72, and 0.94 and RMSE = 24.40%, 27.06%, and 18.10% for TB, TTB, and AGWB. As the equations were calibrated for CSS under the environmental conditions of the Brazilian semiarid region, their transferability to other Cerrado regions should be considered with caution. The inclusion of soil variables (e.g., Al, Mg, and sand) improved predictions, reducing relative costs and taxonomic dependence, while incorporating nutritional adaptations to the acidic soils characteristic of the biome.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Plants
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/plants15152261
Primary Topic
Forest ecology and management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Total Biomass in the Neotropical Savanna Domain: Stock Estimation and Modeling with Edaphic Variables

Ricardo de Oliveira Gaspar, Eraldo Aparecido Trondoli Matricardi, Éder Pereira Miguel, Álvaro Nogueira de Souza et al.
Plants
Forest ecology and management
article

Total Biomass in the Neotropical Savanna Domain: Stock Estimation and Modeling with Edaphic Variables

Ricardo de Oliveira Gaspar, Eraldo Aparecido Trondoli Matricardi, Éder Pereira Miguel, Álvaro Nogueira de Souza, Leonardo Job Biali, Alba Valéria Rezende, Diego Martins Stangerlin, Aldicìr Scariot, Kennedy Nunes Oliveira, Matheus Santos Martins, Evelyn Bianca Almeida Vaz
article en

Abstract

In the Neotropical Savanna domain, few equations are available for estimating biomass stocks in Cerrado sensu stricto (CSS), despite the importance of such tools for estimating carbon stocks, understanding ecosystem functioning, and supporting conservation actions. We conducted forest inventories in 40 temporary 1000 m2 plots in southeastern Brazil to estimate total and compartmental biomass stocks and to model biomass using structural and edaphic predictors. Total biomass (TB) included aboveground woody biomass (AGWB), necromass, litter, and belowground biomass (BGB). AGWB was estimated for trees with basal diameter ≥ 5 cm using a previously fitted regional equation. Root biomass was sampled using a 1 m3 trench excavated at a single point adjacent to each plot. Necromass was quantified using the line-intersect method along a 50 m transect, considering debris with diameter ≥ 3 cm. Litter was sampled using a 0.25 m2 frame placed at the center of each plot. Biomass was modeled on an area basis using a hierarchical approach for TB, total tree biomass (TTB = AGWB + BGB), and AGWB. Mean stocks (Mg ha−1 ± s.d.) were 45.24 ± 17.32 (TB), 20.47 ± 11.26 (AGWB), 18.47 ± 10.88 (BGB), 5.49 ± 4.18 (litter), and 0.81 ± 1.62 (necromass). Models selected using the Akaike Information Criterion (AIC) and validated by repeated k-fold cross-validation achieved rŷy = 0.76, 0.72, and 0.94 and RMSE = 24.40%, 27.06%, and 18.10% for TB, TTB, and AGWB. As the equations were calibrated for CSS under the environmental conditions of the Brazilian semiarid region, their transferability to other Cerrado regions should be considered with caution. The inclusion of soil variables (e.g., Al, Mg, and sand) improved predictions, reducing relative costs and taxonomic dependence, while incorporating nutritional adaptations to the acidic soils characteristic of the biome.

PlantsVol. 15(15)
US Forest Service (US), Universidade de Brasília (BR), Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (BR)
Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Forest ecology and management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.