Proton pump inhibitors use and the risk of osteoporosis and fractures: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

The causal relationship between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and bone health outcomes remains uncertain. This study employs a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to investigate the potential causal association between PPI use and the risk of osteoporosis and fractures. We selected 4 representative PPIs, including omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole, for our study. Bone health outcomes were evaluated through femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), lumbar spine BMD, and the prevalence of osteoporosis and fracture across various anatomical sites, including the upper arm and shoulder, wrist and hand, lumbar spine and pelvis, femur, and lower leg and ankle. To evaluate PPI exposure and bone health outcomes, we utilized summary statistics derived from genome-wide association studies conducted in European ancestry populations. Primary causal estimates were derived using the inverse-variance weighting (IVW) approach, supplemented by MR-Egger, weighted median, and Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier methods. To strengthen the robustness of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses encompassing assessments of heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and leave-one-out analyses. Lansoprazole demonstrated a significant positive causal effect on femoral neck BMD (IVW: β = 0.137, 95% confidence interval: 0.063-0.210, P = 2.73E-04), whereas no statistically significant effects were observed for lansoprazole on lumbar spine BMD, osteoporosis, or fracture risk. Esomeprazole showed a marginal causal association with an elevated risk of femur fracture (IVW: odds ratio = 1.049, 95% confidence interval: 1.004-1.096, P = .031); however, this association lost statistical significance following Bonferroni correction. Its effects on BMD, osteoporosis, and fractures at other anatomical sites remained nonsignificant. No causal associations with BMD, osteoporosis, or fracture risk were identified for either omeprazole or rabeprazole. Sensitivity analyses further reinforced the robustness and reliability of these findings. This MR analysis found no compelling evidence to support a causal association between PPI use and the risk of osteoporosis or fractures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000049964
Primary Topic
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proton pump inhibitors use and the risk of osteoporosis and fractures: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

P Li, Hangchu Shi, Ruiji Wu
Medicine
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
article

Proton pump inhibitors use and the risk of osteoporosis and fractures: A two-sample Mendelian randomization study

P Li, Hangchu Shi, Ruiji Wu
article en

Abstract

The causal relationship between proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use and bone health outcomes remains uncertain. This study employs a Mendelian randomization (MR) approach to investigate the potential causal association between PPI use and the risk of osteoporosis and fractures. We selected 4 representative PPIs, including omeprazole, esomeprazole, lansoprazole, and rabeprazole, for our study. Bone health outcomes were evaluated through femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), lumbar spine BMD, and the prevalence of osteoporosis and fracture across various anatomical sites, including the upper arm and shoulder, wrist and hand, lumbar spine and pelvis, femur, and lower leg and ankle. To evaluate PPI exposure and bone health outcomes, we utilized summary statistics derived from genome-wide association studies conducted in European ancestry populations. Primary causal estimates were derived using the inverse-variance weighting (IVW) approach, supplemented by MR-Egger, weighted median, and Mendelian Randomization Pleiotropy Residual Sum and Outlier methods. To strengthen the robustness of our findings, we conducted sensitivity analyses encompassing assessments of heterogeneity, horizontal pleiotropy, and leave-one-out analyses. Lansoprazole demonstrated a significant positive causal effect on femoral neck BMD (IVW: β = 0.137, 95% confidence interval: 0.063-0.210, P = 2.73E-04), whereas no statistically significant effects were observed for lansoprazole on lumbar spine BMD, osteoporosis, or fracture risk. Esomeprazole showed a marginal causal association with an elevated risk of femur fracture (IVW: odds ratio = 1.049, 95% confidence interval: 1.004-1.096, P = .031); however, this association lost statistical significance following Bonferroni correction. Its effects on BMD, osteoporosis, and fractures at other anatomical sites remained nonsignificant. No causal associations with BMD, osteoporosis, or fracture risk were identified for either omeprazole or rabeprazole. Sensitivity analyses further reinforced the robustness and reliability of these findings. This MR analysis found no compelling evidence to support a causal association between PPI use and the risk of osteoporosis or fractures.

MedicineVol. 105(30)
Wenzhou Medical University (CN), First People's Hospital of Yuhang District (CN), Third People's Hospital of Hangzhou (CN), Hangzhou Medical College (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Genetic Associations and Epidemiology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.