The Anthropocene and its rejection: toward an Anthropocenology

The rejection of the Anthropocene by geological institutions in March 2024 marked a decisive moment in debates about this proposed geological epoch dominated by human activities, which have extended beyond geology over the years. While the decision reaffirmed the Holocene as the current geological epoch, rather than the Anthropocene, it left unresolved broader questions concerning the coordination of knowledge across disciplines needed to address the current ecological crisis. The purpose of this paper is to examine the rejection of the Anthropocene and to propose new horizons for Anthropocene research, structured in two parts. First, it analyzes the arguments advanced in the rejection, and places them in dialogue with the proposal of the Anthropocene Epoch, to assess the broader implications across other fields. Second, it proposes to develop a new research direction on the Anthropocene under the term “Anthropocenology”, by defining its scope, situating it within existing research, and outlining its transdisciplinary project. The analysis suggests that the rejection of the Anthropocene by geological institutions, like any decision, does not preclude further discussion, and that research on the Anthropocene can continue beyond this outcome. Anthropocenology is therefore proposed as a transdisciplinary project aimed at strengthening research and dialogue between the geological sciences, Earth system sciences, and the humanities, in the wake of the rejection, in order to better grasp the complexity of the Anthropocene and to contribute to the reorganization of knowledge that it calls for.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-026-08202-y
Primary Topic
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Anthropocene and its rejection: toward an Anthropocenology

Fabien Colombo
Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
article

The Anthropocene and its rejection: toward an Anthropocenology

Fabien Colombo
article en

Abstract

The rejection of the Anthropocene by geological institutions in March 2024 marked a decisive moment in debates about this proposed geological epoch dominated by human activities, which have extended beyond geology over the years. While the decision reaffirmed the Holocene as the current geological epoch, rather than the Anthropocene, it left unresolved broader questions concerning the coordination of knowledge across disciplines needed to address the current ecological crisis. The purpose of this paper is to examine the rejection of the Anthropocene and to propose new horizons for Anthropocene research, structured in two parts. First, it analyzes the arguments advanced in the rejection, and places them in dialogue with the proposal of the Anthropocene Epoch, to assess the broader implications across other fields. Second, it proposes to develop a new research direction on the Anthropocene under the term “Anthropocenology”, by defining its scope, situating it within existing research, and outlining its transdisciplinary project. The analysis suggests that the rejection of the Anthropocene by geological institutions, like any decision, does not preclude further discussion, and that research on the Anthropocene can continue beyond this outcome. Anthropocenology is therefore proposed as a transdisciplinary project aimed at strengthening research and dialogue between the geological sciences, Earth system sciences, and the humanities, in the wake of the rejection, in order to better grasp the complexity of the Anthropocene and to contribute to the reorganization of knowledge that it calls for.

Humanities and Social Sciences Communications
Université Bordeaux Montaigne (FR), Université catholique de l'ouest (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Ecocriticism and Environmental Literature
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.