Assessment of Bone Bridging of a Novel Wet-Field Regenerative Bone Adhesive for Lumbar Spine Fusion in an Ovine Model at 12, 26, and 52 Weeks

BACKGROUND: Current techniques for instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion include the use of titanium rods and pedicle screws to provide mechanical fixation, while autograft and/or allograft bone is used to promote osseous union across the fusion site. Although bone graft substitutes may be used for this purpose, they can resorb before a solid fusion is established, leading to nonunion. Tetracalcium phosphate-phosphoserine (TTCP-PS) is a novel, bioresorbable, osteoconductive, wet-field mineral-organic bone adhesive and bone graft substitute that has been previously shown to promote bone healing in a number of applications, including cranial bone flap fixation. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate the use of TTCP-PS for fusion in a posterolateral lumbar ovine model and to compare it to a commercially available bone graft substitute. STUDY DESIGN: An ovine lumbar fusion model was used to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TTCP-PS mineral-organic bone adhesive compared with a currently marketed bone graft substitute as a control (Actifuse ABX) over 1 year. These substances were implanted bilaterally in 20 sheep between the L3-L4 and L4-L5 transverse processes, stabilized with a pedicle screw fixation system. METHODS: Postoperative x-ray images, computed tomography scans, and histological findings were assessed at 12, 26, and 52 weeks after implantation to evaluate lumbar fusion across groups and time points. RESULTS: = 0.001) in the TTCP-PS sites (57%) than in the control group sites (31%). By 52 weeks, no statistically significant difference was found between groups, although the mean percentage bone growth area remained higher for the bone adhesive (52%) compared with the control (45%). CONCLUSIONS: TTCP-PS was safe and effective in an ovine posterolateral lumbar fusion model. TTCP-PS promoted earlier and greater (26 weeks) bone bridging in this study than a currently marketed bone graft substitute (Actifuse ABX) while producing greater levels of bone formation at 1 year after surgery. This accelerated healing may aid implant stabilization and reduce the risk of nonunion in posterolateral lumbar fusions in humans. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: TTCP-PS was demonstrated to be safe and effective as a bone graft substitute in this large animal posterolateral spinal fusion model. Its use resulted in superior new bone volume, greater mineral density of the fusion mass, and more rapid bone ingrowth than the control. These properties of TTCP-PS bone adhesive may improve the reliability and success of spinal fusion procedures.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14444/8924
Primary Topic
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessment of Bone Bridging of a Novel Wet-Field Regenerative Bone Adhesive for Lumbar Spine Fusion in an Ovine Model at 12, 26, and 52 Weeks

Jonathan R. Slotkin, Eric J. Woodard, Kevin T. Foley, Ben Gadomski et al.
The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
article

Assessment of Bone Bridging of a Novel Wet-Field Regenerative Bone Adhesive for Lumbar Spine Fusion in an Ovine Model at 12, 26, and 52 Weeks

Jonathan R. Slotkin, Eric J. Woodard, Kevin T. Foley, Ben Gadomski, Brian Hess, Michael C. Brown, Caroline D. Woodard
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Current techniques for instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion include the use of titanium rods and pedicle screws to provide mechanical fixation, while autograft and/or allograft bone is used to promote osseous union across the fusion site. Although bone graft substitutes may be used for this purpose, they can resorb before a solid fusion is established, leading to nonunion. Tetracalcium phosphate-phosphoserine (TTCP-PS) is a novel, bioresorbable, osteoconductive, wet-field mineral-organic bone adhesive and bone graft substitute that has been previously shown to promote bone healing in a number of applications, including cranial bone flap fixation. OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to investigate the use of TTCP-PS for fusion in a posterolateral lumbar ovine model and to compare it to a commercially available bone graft substitute. STUDY DESIGN: An ovine lumbar fusion model was used to evaluate the safety and efficacy of TTCP-PS mineral-organic bone adhesive compared with a currently marketed bone graft substitute as a control (Actifuse ABX) over 1 year. These substances were implanted bilaterally in 20 sheep between the L3-L4 and L4-L5 transverse processes, stabilized with a pedicle screw fixation system. METHODS: Postoperative x-ray images, computed tomography scans, and histological findings were assessed at 12, 26, and 52 weeks after implantation to evaluate lumbar fusion across groups and time points. RESULTS: = 0.001) in the TTCP-PS sites (57%) than in the control group sites (31%). By 52 weeks, no statistically significant difference was found between groups, although the mean percentage bone growth area remained higher for the bone adhesive (52%) compared with the control (45%). CONCLUSIONS: TTCP-PS was safe and effective in an ovine posterolateral lumbar fusion model. TTCP-PS promoted earlier and greater (26 weeks) bone bridging in this study than a currently marketed bone graft substitute (Actifuse ABX) while producing greater levels of bone formation at 1 year after surgery. This accelerated healing may aid implant stabilization and reduce the risk of nonunion in posterolateral lumbar fusions in humans. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: TTCP-PS was demonstrated to be safe and effective as a bone graft substitute in this large animal posterolateral spinal fusion model. Its use resulted in superior new bone volume, greater mineral density of the fusion mass, and more rapid bone ingrowth than the control. These properties of TTCP-PS bone adhesive may improve the reliability and success of spinal fusion procedures.

The International Journal of Spine Surgery
Geisinger Medical Center (US), New England Baptist Hospital (US), University of Massachusetts Lowell (US), University of Tennessee Health Science Center (US), Semmes Murphey Foundation (US), McGill University (CA), Colorado State University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.