More is not always better: Audiovisual speech hampers infants’ face recognition

By 9 months, infants recognize own-race faces from static images, but struggle when familiarized with naturalistic audiovisual (AV) talking faces, despite daily exposure to dynamic, speaking faces. This study examined whether AV speech or AV mouth chewing motion disrupts face recognition and whether selective attention to the mouth or cognitive load mediates this effect. We recorded the eye gaze of 10-month-olds (N = 133) and 20-month-olds (N = 125) during a Visual Paired Comparison task in three conditions: Talking (AV, speech, dynamic), Chewing (AV, no speech, dynamic), and Static (no AV, no speech, static). Infants focused more on the mouth in Chewing, the eyes in Static, and equally on both in Talking. However, recognition occurred only in the Static and Chewing conditions, independently of age. These findings suggest that AV speech, not just motion, increases cognitive load and disrupts face memorization regardless of selective attention, impacting early face processing.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2026.106597
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

More is not always better: Audiovisual speech hampers infants’ face recognition

David Méary, Mathilde Fort, Olivier Pascalis, Joan Birulés
Journal of Experimental Child Psychology
Face Recognition and Perception
article

More is not always better: Audiovisual speech hampers infants’ face recognition

David Méary, Mathilde Fort, Olivier Pascalis, Joan Birulés
article en

Abstract

By 9 months, infants recognize own-race faces from static images, but struggle when familiarized with naturalistic audiovisual (AV) talking faces, despite daily exposure to dynamic, speaking faces. This study examined whether AV speech or AV mouth chewing motion disrupts face recognition and whether selective attention to the mouth or cognitive load mediates this effect. We recorded the eye gaze of 10-month-olds (N = 133) and 20-month-olds (N = 125) during a Visual Paired Comparison task in three conditions: Talking (AV, speech, dynamic), Chewing (AV, no speech, dynamic), and Static (no AV, no speech, static). Infants focused more on the mouth in Chewing, the eyes in Static, and equally on both in Talking. However, recognition occurred only in the Static and Chewing conditions, independently of age. These findings suggest that AV speech, not just motion, increases cognitive load and disrupts face memorization regardless of selective attention, impacting early face processing.

Journal of Experimental Child PsychologyVol. 272
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), Centre de Recherche en Neurosciences de Lyon (FR), Laboratoire de Psychologie et NeuroCognition (FR), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Fondation de France
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.