Preparing for the Next Health Emergency: The Effect of Facility Specialization in Concurrent Management of Pandemic and Non-Pandemic Demand

Problem Definition: We investigate how a network of healthcare facilities should manage non-pandemic and pandemic demand, asking whether each facility must operate in a specialized (i.e., treating a single patient type) or a generalized (i.e., treating both patient types) mode. Given the many drivers of the specialization–generalization decision, we focus on the value that specialization can create by reducing mix-variability in lengths of stay and limiting the scope and intensity of infection prevention measures. Methodology/results: We develop two optimization models that minimize the sum of patient waiting costs and facility infection mitigation costs under a static demand allocation policy. We provide an analytical characterization of the optimal allocation when facilities’ bed capacities are equal, and a highly effective heuristic when they are not. These results suggest that the optimal configuration contains at most one generalized facility. We also propose a simple expression that yields a conservative lower bound on the value of specialization, defined as the reduction in total cost when adopting the specialization-based configurations produced by our models instead of a configuration with all facilities being generalized. Managerial Implications: For length-of-stay parameters from the first COVID-19 waves in England and the Netherlands, this lower bound equals 6.5% and 21.2%, respectively. However, the actual performance gap could be substantially larger depending on infection mitigation costs and capacity imbalances, indicating a considerable potential value of facility specialization. For the special case of two equal-capacity facilities, we also show that a virtual pooling policy, as a representative dynamic policy, yields substantial savings over the best static policy only at very high traffic intensities; at lower intensities, static allocation can perform better. Finally, we show that adopting optimal static allocation policies can substantially reduce costs of a network facing an imminent pandemic by proposing a supply-demand management framework that combines capacity expansion with optimal demand allocation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2024.1172
Primary Topic
Facility Location and Emergency Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Preparing for the Next Health Emergency: The Effect of Facility Specialization in Concurrent Management of Pandemic and Non-Pandemic Demand

Reza Zanjirani Farahani, Navid Izady, Sergei Savin
Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
Facility Location and Emergency Management
article

Preparing for the Next Health Emergency: The Effect of Facility Specialization in Concurrent Management of Pandemic and Non-Pandemic Demand

Reza Zanjirani Farahani, Navid Izady, Sergei Savin
article en

Abstract

Problem Definition: We investigate how a network of healthcare facilities should manage non-pandemic and pandemic demand, asking whether each facility must operate in a specialized (i.e., treating a single patient type) or a generalized (i.e., treating both patient types) mode. Given the many drivers of the specialization–generalization decision, we focus on the value that specialization can create by reducing mix-variability in lengths of stay and limiting the scope and intensity of infection prevention measures. Methodology/results: We develop two optimization models that minimize the sum of patient waiting costs and facility infection mitigation costs under a static demand allocation policy. We provide an analytical characterization of the optimal allocation when facilities’ bed capacities are equal, and a highly effective heuristic when they are not. These results suggest that the optimal configuration contains at most one generalized facility. We also propose a simple expression that yields a conservative lower bound on the value of specialization, defined as the reduction in total cost when adopting the specialization-based configurations produced by our models instead of a configuration with all facilities being generalized. Managerial Implications: For length-of-stay parameters from the first COVID-19 waves in England and the Netherlands, this lower bound equals 6.5% and 21.2%, respectively. However, the actual performance gap could be substantially larger depending on infection mitigation costs and capacity imbalances, indicating a considerable potential value of facility specialization. For the special case of two equal-capacity facilities, we also show that a virtual pooling policy, as a representative dynamic policy, yields substantial savings over the best static policy only at very high traffic intensities; at lower intensities, static allocation can perform better. Finally, we show that adopting optimal static allocation policies can substantially reduce costs of a network facing an imminent pandemic by proposing a supply-demand management framework that combines capacity expansion with optimal demand allocation.

Manufacturing & Service Operations Management
City, University of London (GB), Université Rennes 2 (FR), University of Pennsylvania (US), École Supérieure de Commerce de Rennes (FR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Facility Location and Emergency Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.