Radiographic lunate type prediction: A comparison of fluoroscopy, cross-sectional radiography, and capitate–triquetrum distance analysis in an anatomical setting

PURPOSE: The lunate bone, as the central bone of the proximal carpal row, shows anatomical variability regarding its possible additional articulation with the hamate bone. This allows the morphological classification of the lunate bone into two subtypes according to the absence or presence of an accessory articular facet. Such additional articulation markedly influences the biomechanical behavior of the carpal rows, which makes radiological identification of such variants highly relevant. However, radiographic analysis has shown limited accuracy. This study evaluated the reproducibility and reliability of classic 2D- and 3D-radiography for accurately predicting lunate morphology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty fresh-frozen hand-specimens were obtained; of these, two had to be excluded, leaving 48 specimens for 2D- and 3D-radiography. Two independent observers predicted lunate type and intra- and inter-observer-reliability were assessed. Macroscopic lunate morphology was verified in a specimen-subset. RESULTS: Mean intra-observer Cohen's kappa was 0.524-0.892, indicating moderate to almost perfect agreement. Mean inter-observer Cohen's kappa was 0.292-0.636, indicating fair to substantial agreement. All 12 dissected specimens showed an additional hamate articular facet. Direct imaging measurements led to a correct identification in 25.0% to 50.0% of cases, indicating that accessory medial facets were frequently missed radiographically. CONCLUSION: Radiographic assessment did not reliably identify all lunate bones with two facets in this study. Capitate-triquetrum distance (CTD) analysis showed the highest observer agreement, supporting its value as a reproducible measurement-based method, but it did not eliminate misclassification. Radiographic lunate type prediction should therefore be interpreted with caution, particularly when no additional articular facet is reported.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aanat.2026.153349
Primary Topic
Planetary Science and Exploration
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Radiographic lunate type prediction: A comparison of fluoroscopy, cross-sectional radiography, and capitate–triquetrum distance analysis in an anatomical setting

Lena Hirtler, Tobias L. Dürlinger
Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger
Planetary Science and Exploration
article

Radiographic lunate type prediction: A comparison of fluoroscopy, cross-sectional radiography, and capitate–triquetrum distance analysis in an anatomical setting

Lena Hirtler, Tobias L. Dürlinger
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: The lunate bone, as the central bone of the proximal carpal row, shows anatomical variability regarding its possible additional articulation with the hamate bone. This allows the morphological classification of the lunate bone into two subtypes according to the absence or presence of an accessory articular facet. Such additional articulation markedly influences the biomechanical behavior of the carpal rows, which makes radiological identification of such variants highly relevant. However, radiographic analysis has shown limited accuracy. This study evaluated the reproducibility and reliability of classic 2D- and 3D-radiography for accurately predicting lunate morphology. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifty fresh-frozen hand-specimens were obtained; of these, two had to be excluded, leaving 48 specimens for 2D- and 3D-radiography. Two independent observers predicted lunate type and intra- and inter-observer-reliability were assessed. Macroscopic lunate morphology was verified in a specimen-subset. RESULTS: Mean intra-observer Cohen's kappa was 0.524-0.892, indicating moderate to almost perfect agreement. Mean inter-observer Cohen's kappa was 0.292-0.636, indicating fair to substantial agreement. All 12 dissected specimens showed an additional hamate articular facet. Direct imaging measurements led to a correct identification in 25.0% to 50.0% of cases, indicating that accessory medial facets were frequently missed radiographically. CONCLUSION: Radiographic assessment did not reliably identify all lunate bones with two facets in this study. Capitate-triquetrum distance (CTD) analysis showed the highest observer agreement, supporting its value as a reproducible measurement-based method, but it did not eliminate misclassification. Radiographic lunate type prediction should therefore be interpreted with caution, particularly when no additional articular facet is reported.

Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer AnzeigerVol. 268
Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Planetary Science and Exploration
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Radiographic lunate type prediction: A comparison of fluoroscopy, cross-sectional radiography, and capitate–triquetrum distance analysis in an anatomical setting — Lena Hirtler, Tobias L. Dürlinger · Annals of Anatomy - Anatomischer Anzeiger (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS