Visual acuity measurements with pictorial minimum-separable optotypes show preliminary agreement with a four-direction clinical Landolt ring test in adults

This study compared visual acuity measurements obtained with three pictorial minimum-separable optotypes and a four-direction clinical Landolt ring under identical tablet-based conditions. Thirty adults (mean age, 22.6 ± 3.5 years) without ocular disease other than refractive error were tested monocularly without refractive correction at 3 m. The pictorial task required participants to identify which of two side-by-side images contained gaps. Mean logMAR acuities were 0.49 ± 0.32 for the Landolt ring and 0.50 ± 0.31, 0.51 ± 0.32, and 0.50 ± 0.32 for the banana, ice cream, and tree optotypes, respectively; the four conditions did not differ significantly (Friedman χ²(3) = 1.33, P = 0.72). Bland–Altman mean biases (Landolt ring minus pictorial optotype) were − 0.003, − 0.013, and − 0.010 logMAR, with 95% limits of agreement of − 0.16 to 0.16, − 0.17 to 0.14, and − 0.17 to 0.15, respectively. No significant fixed or proportional bias was detected. These findings provide preliminary within-subject agreement data in cooperative adults under the specific 3-m testing conditions and predefined line-pass criteria. They do not establish equivalence with an ISO/DIN Landolt-C standard, clinical interchangeability, measurement reliability, or pediatric screening validity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-63926-w
Primary Topic
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Visual acuity measurements with pictorial minimum-separable optotypes show preliminary agreement with a four-direction clinical Landolt ring test in adults

Yo Iwata
Scientific Reports
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
article

Visual acuity measurements with pictorial minimum-separable optotypes show preliminary agreement with a four-direction clinical Landolt ring test in adults

Yo Iwata
article en

Abstract

This study compared visual acuity measurements obtained with three pictorial minimum-separable optotypes and a four-direction clinical Landolt ring under identical tablet-based conditions. Thirty adults (mean age, 22.6 ± 3.5 years) without ocular disease other than refractive error were tested monocularly without refractive correction at 3 m. The pictorial task required participants to identify which of two side-by-side images contained gaps. Mean logMAR acuities were 0.49 ± 0.32 for the Landolt ring and 0.50 ± 0.31, 0.51 ± 0.32, and 0.50 ± 0.32 for the banana, ice cream, and tree optotypes, respectively; the four conditions did not differ significantly (Friedman χ²(3) = 1.33, P = 0.72). Bland–Altman mean biases (Landolt ring minus pictorial optotype) were − 0.003, − 0.013, and − 0.010 logMAR, with 95% limits of agreement of − 0.16 to 0.16, − 0.17 to 0.14, and − 0.17 to 0.15, respectively. No significant fixed or proportional bias was detected. These findings provide preliminary within-subject agreement data in cooperative adults under the specific 3-m testing conditions and predefined line-pass criteria. They do not establish equivalence with an ISO/DIN Landolt-C standard, clinical interchangeability, measurement reliability, or pediatric screening validity.

Scientific Reports
Kitasato University (JP)
School of Allied Health Sciences, Kitasato University
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Ophthalmology and Visual Impairment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.