Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Heritage for Cultural Spaces: Cases from Turkey and Europe

This study offers a comparative examination of transforming industrial heritage into cultural spaces through cases from Turkey and Europe. The scope is limited to three cases from Istanbul (Müze Gazhane, Santralistanbul, Bomontiada) and three from Europe (Tate Modern, Westergasfabriek, Matadero Madrid). A multiple-case comparative design is adopted; the cases were selected using data-rich and diversity-oriented criteria. Data collection relies on document review and visual analysis; evaluation focuses on spatial–architectural transformation, urban integration, public-space use, social impacts, and the legal–institutional framework. The findings show that, in both contexts, industrial heritage functions not merely as an object of physical preservation but as a vehicle for cultural production and social revitalisation. However, while Istanbul’s examples are largely single-building oriented, the European projects develop holistic, complex-scale scenarios supported by robust legislation and incentives. The results underscore the need in Turkey for a comprehensive inventory, dedicated regulations, and long-term cultural policies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29130/dubited.1791012
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Heritage for Cultural Spaces: Cases from Turkey and Europe

Gizem Büke Öztürk
Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Adaptive Reuse of Industrial Heritage for Cultural Spaces: Cases from Turkey and Europe

Gizem Büke Öztürk
article en

Abstract

This study offers a comparative examination of transforming industrial heritage into cultural spaces through cases from Turkey and Europe. The scope is limited to three cases from Istanbul (Müze Gazhane, Santralistanbul, Bomontiada) and three from Europe (Tate Modern, Westergasfabriek, Matadero Madrid). A multiple-case comparative design is adopted; the cases were selected using data-rich and diversity-oriented criteria. Data collection relies on document review and visual analysis; evaluation focuses on spatial–architectural transformation, urban integration, public-space use, social impacts, and the legal–institutional framework. The findings show that, in both contexts, industrial heritage functions not merely as an object of physical preservation but as a vehicle for cultural production and social revitalisation. However, while Istanbul’s examples are largely single-building oriented, the European projects develop holistic, complex-scale scenarios supported by robust legislation and incentives. The results underscore the need in Turkey for a comprehensive inventory, dedicated regulations, and long-term cultural policies.

Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji DergisiVol. 14(3)
Bilecik Şeyh Edebali Üniversitesi (TR)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.