Quality of life assessment for colorectal cancer follow‐up: A latent profile analysis of <scp>EORTC</scp> measures

AIM: To identify distinct health-related quality of life (HRQoL) profiles among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), with the aim of informing more personalised follow-up strategies. METHODS: Baseline HRQoL data from CRC patients enrolled in the FUTURE-primary study, a multicentre implementation study on home-based follow-up, were analysed. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires. Aggregated symptom and function scales were developed using factor analysis and expert consensus. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was applied to identify subgroups based on PROM responses. Model selection was guided by the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), entropy, average posterior probabilities (AvePP), class sizes, clinical interpretability, and additional sensitivity and stability analyses. RESULTS: Three HRQoL profiles were identified: low HRQoL (n = 62), intermediate HRQoL (n = 95), and high HRQoL (n = 42). The profiles followed a gradient-like pattern, with consistently high, moderate, or low scores across symptom burden and functional outcomes. Classification quality was high, as indicated by high entropy (>0.93) and average posterior probabilities (>0.96), although profile assignment should be interpreted probabilistically. CONCLUSION: This study highlights variation in HRQoL among CRC patients. LPA identified three profiles that primarily reflected differences in overall symptom burden and functioning. These profiles may provide a preliminary framework for describing differences in supportive care needs, but their clinical applicability for tailoring follow-up or allocating care resources requires longitudinal validation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Identifying HRQoL profiles may support more personalised follow-up, ensuring targeted care for those with higher symptom burden and lower functional scores, while reducing unnecessary interventions for others.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Colorectal Disease
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/codi.70553
Primary Topic
Cancer survivorship and care
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of life assessment for colorectal cancer follow‐up: A latent profile analysis of EORTC measures

Cornelis Verhoef, Koen Peeters, Martijn A. H. Oude Voshaar, Olga Husson et al.
Colorectal Disease
Cancer survivorship and care
article

Quality of life assessment for colorectal cancer follow‐up: A latent profile analysis of EORTC measures

Cornelis Verhoef, Koen Peeters, Martijn A. H. Oude Voshaar, Olga Husson, Jennifer MJ Schreinemakers, Dirk J. Grünhagen, Lissa Wullaert, M. H. Elise van Driel, Kelly R. Voigt, M. Verseveld, P Doornebosch
article en

Abstract

AIM: To identify distinct health-related quality of life (HRQoL) profiles among colorectal cancer (CRC) patients using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), with the aim of informing more personalised follow-up strategies. METHODS: Baseline HRQoL data from CRC patients enrolled in the FUTURE-primary study, a multicentre implementation study on home-based follow-up, were analysed. Patients completed the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CR29 questionnaires. Aggregated symptom and function scales were developed using factor analysis and expert consensus. Latent profile analysis (LPA) was applied to identify subgroups based on PROM responses. Model selection was guided by the Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC), entropy, average posterior probabilities (AvePP), class sizes, clinical interpretability, and additional sensitivity and stability analyses. RESULTS: Three HRQoL profiles were identified: low HRQoL (n = 62), intermediate HRQoL (n = 95), and high HRQoL (n = 42). The profiles followed a gradient-like pattern, with consistently high, moderate, or low scores across symptom burden and functional outcomes. Classification quality was high, as indicated by high entropy (>0.93) and average posterior probabilities (>0.96), although profile assignment should be interpreted probabilistically. CONCLUSION: This study highlights variation in HRQoL among CRC patients. LPA identified three profiles that primarily reflected differences in overall symptom burden and functioning. These profiles may provide a preliminary framework for describing differences in supportive care needs, but their clinical applicability for tailoring follow-up or allocating care resources requires longitudinal validation. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Identifying HRQoL profiles may support more personalised follow-up, ensuring targeted care for those with higher symptom burden and lower functional scores, while reducing unnecessary interventions for others.

Colorectal DiseaseVol. 28(8)
Leiden University Medical Center (NL), Sint Franciscus Gasthuis (NL), Amphia Ziekenhuis (NL), Oncode Institute (NL), IJsselland Ziekenhuis (NL), Erasmus MC Cancer Institute (NL), Erasmus University Rotterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 11%
Cancer survivorship and care
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.