Procedural neuronormativity: police procedure and the limits of disability recognition

Police violence against disabled people is often framed as a problem of officer recognition: officers fail to identify disability and therefore need better training. This Current Issues article argues that this frame leaves a deeper procedural problem intact. It advances the concept of procedural neuronormativity: the encoding of neurotypical compliance—rapid verbal response, controlled movement, regulated affect, and legible submission—into police use-of-force routines as the operational definition of safety. Using the killing of Ryan Gainer, a fifteen-year-old Black autistic teenager, as its point of departure, the article argues that police procedure can convert disabled distress into non-compliance, non-compliance into threat, and threat into justification for force. Disability studies has the analytic tools to name this mechanism, but doing so requires shifting attention from officer recognition to the procedural scripts through which disabled and racialized bodies are made dangerous.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Disability & Society
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09687599.2026.2702486
Primary Topic
Free Will and Agency
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Procedural neuronormativity: police procedure and the limits of disability recognition

Landon Schnabel
Disability & Society
Free Will and Agency
article

Procedural neuronormativity: police procedure and the limits of disability recognition

Landon Schnabel
article en

Abstract

Police violence against disabled people is often framed as a problem of officer recognition: officers fail to identify disability and therefore need better training. This Current Issues article argues that this frame leaves a deeper procedural problem intact. It advances the concept of procedural neuronormativity: the encoding of neurotypical compliance—rapid verbal response, controlled movement, regulated affect, and legible submission—into police use-of-force routines as the operational definition of safety. Using the killing of Ryan Gainer, a fifteen-year-old Black autistic teenager, as its point of departure, the article argues that police procedure can convert disabled distress into non-compliance, non-compliance into threat, and threat into justification for force. Disability studies has the analytic tools to name this mechanism, but doing so requires shifting attention from officer recognition to the procedural scripts through which disabled and racialized bodies are made dangerous.

Disability & Society
Cornell University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Free Will and Agency
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Procedural neuronormativity: police procedure and the limits of disability recognition — Landon Schnabel · Disability & Society (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS