Bridging practice and theory for business doctoral education in Thailand: evaluating the theory-practice scaffold (TPS) framework

Purpose This study aims to examine how a structured theory-practice scaffold (TPS) framework supports practitioner-doctoral students in a Thai business school context to transform executive experience into theoretically grounded and contextually situated research questions. Design/methodology/approach The TPS framework was implemented across two consecutive cohorts in an entry doctoral coursework within a Ph.D. in Business Administration program. The first cohort completed iterative reflective assignments without the TPS reflection form, while the second cohort used the structured TPS form as a design intervention. The analysis draws on a single dataset the qualitative analysis of student reflections and rubric-based assessment of the same assignments. Quantitative scoring is used descriptively to support qualitative interpretation. Findings Students in the redesigned course demonstrated richer conceptual framing and more theory-anchored and transferable research questions. Qualitative evidence of cognitive development is the primary basis for the findings, with descriptive data from coursework-based assessments providing corroborating support (with average rubric scores increasing by approximately 0.6 points on a 0-2 rubric scale). The framework provides a structured and adaptable model for work-applied doctoral education settings. Findings provide actionable insights for educators designing practitioner-oriented doctoral programs. Practical implications Structured reflection combined with formative dialog enables practitioner-students to internalize abductive reasoning and develop dissertation-ready thinking early in their doctoral study. Originality/value The paper advances a design-based approach for bridging practice and theory in doctoral education. It illustrates how abductive reflection scaffolds cultivate scholarly inquiry within work-applied education by enhancing contextual insight and relatability and offering broader implications transferable to similar professional doctorate contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Work-Applied Management
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jwam-10-2025-0213
Primary Topic
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Bridging practice and theory for business doctoral education in Thailand: evaluating the theory-practice scaffold (TPS) framework

Manoj Chatpibal
Journal of Work-Applied Management
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
article

Bridging practice and theory for business doctoral education in Thailand: evaluating the theory-practice scaffold (TPS) framework

Manoj Chatpibal
article en

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine how a structured theory-practice scaffold (TPS) framework supports practitioner-doctoral students in a Thai business school context to transform executive experience into theoretically grounded and contextually situated research questions. Design/methodology/approach The TPS framework was implemented across two consecutive cohorts in an entry doctoral coursework within a Ph.D. in Business Administration program. The first cohort completed iterative reflective assignments without the TPS reflection form, while the second cohort used the structured TPS form as a design intervention. The analysis draws on a single dataset the qualitative analysis of student reflections and rubric-based assessment of the same assignments. Quantitative scoring is used descriptively to support qualitative interpretation. Findings Students in the redesigned course demonstrated richer conceptual framing and more theory-anchored and transferable research questions. Qualitative evidence of cognitive development is the primary basis for the findings, with descriptive data from coursework-based assessments providing corroborating support (with average rubric scores increasing by approximately 0.6 points on a 0-2 rubric scale). The framework provides a structured and adaptable model for work-applied doctoral education settings. Findings provide actionable insights for educators designing practitioner-oriented doctoral programs. Practical implications Structured reflection combined with formative dialog enables practitioner-students to internalize abductive reasoning and develop dissertation-ready thinking early in their doctoral study. Originality/value The paper advances a design-based approach for bridging practice and theory in doctoral education. It illustrates how abductive reflection scaffolds cultivate scholarly inquiry within work-applied education by enhancing contextual insight and relatability and offering broader implications transferable to similar professional doctorate contexts.

Journal of Work-Applied Management
King Mongkut's Institute of Technology Ladkrabang (TH)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Doctoral Education Challenges and Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Bridging practice and theory for business doctoral education in Thailand: evaluating the theory-practice scaffold (TPS) framework — Manoj Chatpibal · Journal of Work-Applied Management (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS