Water-Holding Characteristics of Forestry Residues for Urban Bare Soil Mulching

Objective: Forestry management produces abundant residues including wood chips, fallen leaves and bark. Reusing them as urban organic mulches improves soil quality, mitigates soil erosion and optimizes urban green space ecology. This study analyzed the water-holding characteristics of four typical forestry residues to guide urban mulch selection. Methods: Soaking lab tests were conducted on pine bark (PB), oak leaves (OLs), pine needles (PNs), and fir wood chips (FWCs) to monitor dynamic variations in water-holding capacity and absorption rate over soaking time, with data fitted by mathematical models. Results: All forestry residues exhibited considerable water-holding capacity, with OLs showing the highest water-retention performance (175.67 t/ha, 145.42%), effective interception capacity (119.83 t/ha) and interception rate (99.19%) among all tested materials, followed by FWCs. The water-holding capacity increased rapidly and then leveled off with prolonged soaking time, and this trend conformed to a logarithmic equation, expressed as Q = a·ln(t) + b. Water absorption peaked at 15 min before declining slowly until equilibrium, and this dynamic process was well fitted by a power function, expressed as V = k·tn. Conclusions: Given their superior water-holding characteristics, OLs and FWCs are highly recommended as preferred organic mulches for urban soil applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Forests
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/f17080866
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Water-Holding Characteristics of Forestry Residues for Urban Bare Soil Mulching

Peisheng Ye, Bingpeng Qu, Xinyu Wang, Gang Hu et al.
Forests
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
article

Water-Holding Characteristics of Forestry Residues for Urban Bare Soil Mulching

Peisheng Ye, Bingpeng Qu, Xinyu Wang, Gang Hu, Xinyuan Mo, Yanfei Wei, Wei Zhou, Ying Jiang, Baopeng Lu, Liang Wei, Yinjun Zhao
article en

Abstract

Objective: Forestry management produces abundant residues including wood chips, fallen leaves and bark. Reusing them as urban organic mulches improves soil quality, mitigates soil erosion and optimizes urban green space ecology. This study analyzed the water-holding characteristics of four typical forestry residues to guide urban mulch selection. Methods: Soaking lab tests were conducted on pine bark (PB), oak leaves (OLs), pine needles (PNs), and fir wood chips (FWCs) to monitor dynamic variations in water-holding capacity and absorption rate over soaking time, with data fitted by mathematical models. Results: All forestry residues exhibited considerable water-holding capacity, with OLs showing the highest water-retention performance (175.67 t/ha, 145.42%), effective interception capacity (119.83 t/ha) and interception rate (99.19%) among all tested materials, followed by FWCs. The water-holding capacity increased rapidly and then leveled off with prolonged soaking time, and this trend conformed to a logarithmic equation, expressed as Q = a·ln(t) + b. Water absorption peaked at 15 min before declining slowly until equilibrium, and this dynamic process was well fitted by a power function, expressed as V = k·tn. Conclusions: Given their superior water-holding characteristics, OLs and FWCs are highly recommended as preferred organic mulches for urban soil applications.

ForestsVol. 17(8)
Guangxi University (CN), Guangxi Science and Technology Department (CN), Nanning Normal University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Province, Science and Technology Department of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.