Decision-Making Among Street-Level Bureaucrats in Residential Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review

This scoping review synthesizes evidence on discretionary decision-making by street-level bureaucrats in residential care for older adults and its implications for care quality and residents' well-being. Following the PRISMA-ScR framework, 12 studies published between 2019 and 2024 were reviewed. Four themes emerged: resident autonomy, shared decision-making, ethical and relational practices, and organizational factors. Findings highlight variability in discretionary practices shaped by organizational cultures, resource constraints, and differing interpretations of autonomy. The review underscores the need for supportive policies, adequate staffing, professional training, and organizational environments that promote transparent, participatory, and person-centred decision-making.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Gerontological Social Work
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/01634372.2026.2708797
Primary Topic
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Decision-Making Among Street-Level Bureaucrats in Residential Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review

Mónica Teixeira, Ricardo Crispim, Carolina Fonseca, Ana Paula Caetano
Journal of Gerontological Social Work
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
article

Decision-Making Among Street-Level Bureaucrats in Residential Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review

Mónica Teixeira, Ricardo Crispim, Carolina Fonseca, Ana Paula Caetano
article en

Abstract

This scoping review synthesizes evidence on discretionary decision-making by street-level bureaucrats in residential care for older adults and its implications for care quality and residents' well-being. Following the PRISMA-ScR framework, 12 studies published between 2019 and 2024 were reviewed. Four themes emerged: resident autonomy, shared decision-making, ethical and relational practices, and organizational factors. Findings highlight variability in discretionary practices shaped by organizational cultures, resource constraints, and differing interpretations of autonomy. The review underscores the need for supportive policies, adequate staffing, professional training, and organizational environments that promote transparent, participatory, and person-centred decision-making.

Journal of Gerontological Social Work
Clovis Oncology (United States) (US), Universidade Politécnica de Portalegre (PT), University of Coimbra (PT), Universidade Lusófona (PT)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Decision-Making Among Street-Level Bureaucrats in Residential Care for Older Adults: A Scoping Review — Mónica Teixeira, Ricardo Crispim, et al. · Journal of Gerontological Social Work (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS