Measures matter: assessing childhood maltreatment and emotion dysregulation in a transdiagnostic sample

Background: Childhood maltreatment (CM) is a major risk factor for different mental disorders and transdiagnostic mechanisms, including emotion dysregulation. Progress in the field has been constrained by substantial variability in the measurement of CM across studies.Objective: We aimed to examine the associations among three common retrospective measures of CM and their relationship with emotion dysregulation in a transdiagnostic adult sample, with a focus on exploring the significance of sensitive developmental periods.Method: In our cross-sectional study, we collected data from N = 462 participants with and without different mental disorders. We assessed facets of CM using two questionnaires and one in-person interview, specifically the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire – Short Form (CTQ-SF), the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA.Q), and the brief German interview version of the Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale (MACE), the KERF-40+. We measured emotion dysregulation in a subsample of n = 244 participants using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). We analysed data applying correlational analyses and machine-learning-based conditional random forest regression.Results: In our transdiagnostic sample, global scores (including sum, multiplicity, and duration scores) and subscale scores of the CTQ-SF, CECA.Q, and KERF-40+ were highly intercorrelated. Both global scores of the CTQ-SF and KERF-40+, and emotional CM scores of the CTQ-SF, CECA.Q, and KERF-40+ showed significant associations with the DERS total score. Regarding sensitive developmental periods, exposure to parental emotional abuse, emotional neglect, and emotional and physical abuse by peers – particularly during the ages 12–17 – was significantly associated with the DERS total score.Conclusions: Despite substantial differences in the facets of CM assessed, the CTQ-SF, CECA.Q, and KERF-40+ demonstrate high convergent validity. While CTQ-SF and CECA.Q allow for a more efficient assessment of CM experiences, the KERF-40+ offers added value for developmentally sensitive analyses of adult emotion dysregulation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/20008066.2026.2696095
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Measures matter: assessing childhood maltreatment and emotion dysregulation in a transdiagnostic sample

Sylvia Steinmann, K. Seitz, Antonia Brühl, Nina Heinrichs et al.
European Journal of Psychotraumatology
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Measures matter: assessing childhood maltreatment and emotion dysregulation in a transdiagnostic sample

Sylvia Steinmann, K. Seitz, Antonia Brühl, Nina Heinrichs, Inga Schalinski, Corinne Neukel, B Renneberg, Sabine C. Herpertz
article en

Abstract

Background: Childhood maltreatment (CM) is a major risk factor for different mental disorders and transdiagnostic mechanisms, including emotion dysregulation. Progress in the field has been constrained by substantial variability in the measurement of CM across studies.Objective: We aimed to examine the associations among three common retrospective measures of CM and their relationship with emotion dysregulation in a transdiagnostic adult sample, with a focus on exploring the significance of sensitive developmental periods.Method: In our cross-sectional study, we collected data from N = 462 participants with and without different mental disorders. We assessed facets of CM using two questionnaires and one in-person interview, specifically the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire – Short Form (CTQ-SF), the Childhood Experience of Care and Abuse Questionnaire (CECA.Q), and the brief German interview version of the Maltreatment and Abuse Chronology of Exposure scale (MACE), the KERF-40+. We measured emotion dysregulation in a subsample of n = 244 participants using the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS). We analysed data applying correlational analyses and machine-learning-based conditional random forest regression.Results: In our transdiagnostic sample, global scores (including sum, multiplicity, and duration scores) and subscale scores of the CTQ-SF, CECA.Q, and KERF-40+ were highly intercorrelated. Both global scores of the CTQ-SF and KERF-40+, and emotional CM scores of the CTQ-SF, CECA.Q, and KERF-40+ showed significant associations with the DERS total score. Regarding sensitive developmental periods, exposure to parental emotional abuse, emotional neglect, and emotional and physical abuse by peers – particularly during the ages 12–17 – was significantly associated with the DERS total score.Conclusions: Despite substantial differences in the facets of CM assessed, the CTQ-SF, CECA.Q, and KERF-40+ demonstrate high convergent validity. While CTQ-SF and CECA.Q allow for a more efficient assessment of CM experiences, the KERF-40+ offers added value for developmentally sensitive analyses of adult emotion dysregulation.

European Journal of PsychotraumatologyVol. 17(1)
University of Bremen (DE), Bielefeld University (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), Universität der Bundeswehr München (DE), Freie Universität Berlin (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Ministerium für Wissenschaft, Forschung und Kunst Baden-Württemberg
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.