An Infrastructural politics of emotion: Anticipating discomfort, managing expectations and developing routines in Australian community centres

At a time when loneliness and social isolation are increasingly being identified as a social challenge that has far reaching consequences, solutions tend to focus disproportionately on upskilling, directing or supporting individuals who experience this burden. By conceptualising the infrastructural politics of emotions that make social infrastructure accessible and inviting to some people and not others, this paper challenges these tendencies. The paper develops a framework for analysing an infrastructural politics of emotion and illustrates this approach using interviews with 46 people from three community centres which explored their initial and ongoing involvement with a centre. Through this approach the paper puts forward three contributions. First, we discuss how emotions, ranging from anticipatory feelings like anxiety to the comfort of familiarity, mediate people’s openness and engagement with social infrastructure. Second, we discuss how emotions contribute to the development of norms and expectations which govern social interactions and how people understand these. Finally, we discuss how routines, which are developed and understood over time, steer how people use infrastructure, and can provide the emotional scaffolding of familiarity and comfort which support social connection. This paper’s framing of an infrastructural politics of emotion advances geographical thinking by placing people, their practices and their feelings at the centre of what constitutes social infrastructure. Framing social infrastructure in this way points to new avenues for responding to issues like loneliness, which, while experienced individually, require collective and structural responses.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geoforum
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2026.104780
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Infrastructural politics of emotion: Anticipating discomfort, managing expectations and developing routines in Australian community centres

Sharlene Nipperess, Imogen Carr, Ellen van Holstein, Iris Levin
Geoforum
Urban Planning and Governance
article

An Infrastructural politics of emotion: Anticipating discomfort, managing expectations and developing routines in Australian community centres

Sharlene Nipperess, Imogen Carr, Ellen van Holstein, Iris Levin
article en

Abstract

At a time when loneliness and social isolation are increasingly being identified as a social challenge that has far reaching consequences, solutions tend to focus disproportionately on upskilling, directing or supporting individuals who experience this burden. By conceptualising the infrastructural politics of emotions that make social infrastructure accessible and inviting to some people and not others, this paper challenges these tendencies. The paper develops a framework for analysing an infrastructural politics of emotion and illustrates this approach using interviews with 46 people from three community centres which explored their initial and ongoing involvement with a centre. Through this approach the paper puts forward three contributions. First, we discuss how emotions, ranging from anticipatory feelings like anxiety to the comfort of familiarity, mediate people’s openness and engagement with social infrastructure. Second, we discuss how emotions contribute to the development of norms and expectations which govern social interactions and how people understand these. Finally, we discuss how routines, which are developed and understood over time, steer how people use infrastructure, and can provide the emotional scaffolding of familiarity and comfort which support social connection. This paper’s framing of an infrastructural politics of emotion advances geographical thinking by placing people, their practices and their feelings at the centre of what constitutes social infrastructure. Framing social infrastructure in this way points to new avenues for responding to issues like loneliness, which, while experienced individually, require collective and structural responses.

GeoforumVol. 176
The University of Melbourne (AU), RMIT University (AU)
VicHealth
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Urban Planning and Governance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.