Constructing a rehabilitation index to assess the relationship between prison environments and reoffending

Abstract Correctional rehabilitation policy typically targets individual risk, with little attention to institutional risk. Using administrative data on 11,302 adult men released from 45 prisons in one Australian jurisdiction, we estimate multiple-membership multilevel logistic models that time-weight exposure across facilities and benchmark prisons with a risk-adjusted rehabilitation index. Prisons differed significantly in reimprisonment rates after adjusting for individual risk profiles. Contextual features and in-prison experiences were associated with outcomes. Including people’s in-prison experiences made the model better at distinguishing who returned to custody and explained much of the remaining difference between prisons. Findings challenge person-only explanations of reoffending and show that institutional context matters. The approach offers a learning-oriented model of prison accountability and points to practical ways to improve rehabilitative performance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The British Journal of Criminology
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azag058
Primary Topic
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Constructing a rehabilitation index to assess the relationship between prison environments and reoffending

Jennifer Galouzis, D. L. Johns, Stuart Ross, Denny Meyer et al.
The British Journal of Criminology
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
article

Constructing a rehabilitation index to assess the relationship between prison environments and reoffending

Jennifer Galouzis, D. L. Johns, Stuart Ross, Denny Meyer, Andrew Day
article en

Abstract

Abstract Correctional rehabilitation policy typically targets individual risk, with little attention to institutional risk. Using administrative data on 11,302 adult men released from 45 prisons in one Australian jurisdiction, we estimate multiple-membership multilevel logistic models that time-weight exposure across facilities and benchmark prisons with a risk-adjusted rehabilitation index. Prisons differed significantly in reimprisonment rates after adjusting for individual risk profiles. Contextual features and in-prison experiences were associated with outcomes. Including people’s in-prison experiences made the model better at distinguishing who returned to custody and explained much of the remaining difference between prisons. Findings challenge person-only explanations of reoffending and show that institutional context matters. The approach offers a learning-oriented model of prison accountability and points to practical ways to improve rehabilitative performance.

The British Journal of Criminology
The University of Melbourne (AU), Swinburne University of Technology (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Constructing a rehabilitation index to assess the relationship between prison environments and reoffending — Jennifer Galouzis, D. L. Johns, et al. · The British Journal of Criminology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS