Frailty, trajectories of frailty, and cognitive impairment: evidence from five longitudinal cohort studies

Longitudinal studies examining the impacts of frailty and its transitions on cognitive impairment in older adults across multiple regions remain scarce. This study aimed to explore the associations of baseline frailty status and frailty trajectories with cognitive impairment in five large-scale cohort studies. Data were derived from five prospective cohorts conducted in the United States, England, Europe, China, and Korea. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the relationship between baseline frailty and cognitive impairment. Meta-analyses were performed to synthesize the overall effect sizes across all cohorts. Trajectories of frailty were identified using latent class growth models. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to investigate the association between frailty trajectories and cognitive impairment. Among the 47,429 participants included in the analyses of baseline frailty status, 8,799 developed cognitive impairment over median follow-up periods of 4.09 to 10.00 years. Compared with robust participants, pre-frail participants exhibited a significantly increased risk of cognitive impairment (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] range: 1.17 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.34] to 1.35 [95% CI: 1.09–1.68], pooled HR: 1.25 [95% CI: 1.18–1.33]). Similarly, frail participants showed an elevated risk of cognitive impairment (adjusted HR range: 1.55 [95% CI: 1.25–1.92] to 2.16 [95% CI: 1.72–2.72], pooled HR: 1.69 [95% CI: 1.50–1.90]). A total of 22,310 participants were included in the analyses of frailty trajectory, among whom 4,717 developed cognitive impairment. Frailty trajectories were significantly associated with cognitive impairment: higher trajectory class was linked to an elevated risk of cognitive impairment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] range: 1.45 [95% CI: 1.09–1.93] to 4.37 [95% CI: 3.43–5.59]), whereas lower trajectory class was connected to a reduced risk (adjusted OR range: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.39–0.54] to 0.72 [95% CI: 0.59–0.88]). Baseline frailty status is associated with cognitive impairment in the broader aging populations, and frailty trajectories are linked to cognitive impairment among the surviving older adults. Early frailty screening and detection may facilitate risk stratification and improve the management of cognitive impairment in older populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Public Health
Published
2026-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-026-28715-0
Primary Topic
Frailty in Older Adults
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Frailty, trajectories of frailty, and cognitive impairment: evidence from five longitudinal cohort studies

Shiwen Zhang, Li Li, Le Peng, Z Y Chen
BMC Public Health
Frailty in Older Adults
article

Frailty, trajectories of frailty, and cognitive impairment: evidence from five longitudinal cohort studies

Shiwen Zhang, Li Li, Le Peng, Z Y Chen
article en

Abstract

Longitudinal studies examining the impacts of frailty and its transitions on cognitive impairment in older adults across multiple regions remain scarce. This study aimed to explore the associations of baseline frailty status and frailty trajectories with cognitive impairment in five large-scale cohort studies. Data were derived from five prospective cohorts conducted in the United States, England, Europe, China, and Korea. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the relationship between baseline frailty and cognitive impairment. Meta-analyses were performed to synthesize the overall effect sizes across all cohorts. Trajectories of frailty were identified using latent class growth models. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to investigate the association between frailty trajectories and cognitive impairment. Among the 47,429 participants included in the analyses of baseline frailty status, 8,799 developed cognitive impairment over median follow-up periods of 4.09 to 10.00 years. Compared with robust participants, pre-frail participants exhibited a significantly increased risk of cognitive impairment (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] range: 1.17 [95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.02–1.34] to 1.35 [95% CI: 1.09–1.68], pooled HR: 1.25 [95% CI: 1.18–1.33]). Similarly, frail participants showed an elevated risk of cognitive impairment (adjusted HR range: 1.55 [95% CI: 1.25–1.92] to 2.16 [95% CI: 1.72–2.72], pooled HR: 1.69 [95% CI: 1.50–1.90]). A total of 22,310 participants were included in the analyses of frailty trajectory, among whom 4,717 developed cognitive impairment. Frailty trajectories were significantly associated with cognitive impairment: higher trajectory class was linked to an elevated risk of cognitive impairment (adjusted odds ratio [OR] range: 1.45 [95% CI: 1.09–1.93] to 4.37 [95% CI: 3.43–5.59]), whereas lower trajectory class was connected to a reduced risk (adjusted OR range: 0.46 [95% CI: 0.39–0.54] to 0.72 [95% CI: 0.59–0.88]). Baseline frailty status is associated with cognitive impairment in the broader aging populations, and frailty trajectories are linked to cognitive impairment among the surviving older adults. Early frailty screening and detection may facilitate risk stratification and improve the management of cognitive impairment in older populations.

BMC Public Health
Xuzhou Medical College (CN), Aerospace Center Hospital (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Frailty in Older Adults
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.