Who is Afraid of Balkanization? The Transnational Life of a Metaphor in Competing Globalization Projects

Abstract This article takes the contemporary revival of the “Balkanization” metaphor as a starting point from which to examine its transnational historical trajectory. The existing literature has interpreted “Balkanization” either as a variation of Orientalism or as a symptom of de-globalization. Drawing on the theory of multiple globalization projects, this article traces the circulation of the term across different political and geographical contexts, asking what kinds of crises it tends to encapsulate in the course of its travels. Methodologically, the study relies on the transnational travels of concepts and critical metaphor analysis. The article shows that the term has come to embody both the promises and perils of the national globalization project – its aspirations to autonomy and destruction of the existing imperial order, as well as its inner potential toward imperialism and its own vulnerability to further fragmentation. “Balkanization,” then, mirrors the tensions between different globalizations embodying experiments with territory, sovereignty, citizenship and the politics of belonging. Far from being an anomaly standing for fragmentation or the “Orientalist gaze,” “Balkanization” actually renders visible the global history of multiple globalizations and the various perspectives of its protagonists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
New Global Studies
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/ngs-2025-0036
Primary Topic
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Who is Afraid of Balkanization? The Transnational Life of a Metaphor in Competing Globalization Projects

Katarina Ristić
New Global Studies
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
article

Who is Afraid of Balkanization? The Transnational Life of a Metaphor in Competing Globalization Projects

Katarina Ristić
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article takes the contemporary revival of the “Balkanization” metaphor as a starting point from which to examine its transnational historical trajectory. The existing literature has interpreted “Balkanization” either as a variation of Orientalism or as a symptom of de-globalization. Drawing on the theory of multiple globalization projects, this article traces the circulation of the term across different political and geographical contexts, asking what kinds of crises it tends to encapsulate in the course of its travels. Methodologically, the study relies on the transnational travels of concepts and critical metaphor analysis. The article shows that the term has come to embody both the promises and perils of the national globalization project – its aspirations to autonomy and destruction of the existing imperial order, as well as its inner potential toward imperialism and its own vulnerability to further fragmentation. “Balkanization,” then, mirrors the tensions between different globalizations embodying experiments with territory, sovereignty, citizenship and the politics of belonging. Far from being an anomaly standing for fragmentation or the “Orientalist gaze,” “Balkanization” actually renders visible the global history of multiple globalizations and the various perspectives of its protagonists.

New Global Studies
Leipzig University (DE)
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Balkans: History, Politics, Society
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.