FRED enables standardized FAIR metadata generation and management for omics research

Scientific research relies on transparent dissemination of data and its associated interpretations, including raw data, metadata, experimental design, and data processing details. Production and handling of research data represents an ongoing challenge, extending beyond publication into individual facilities, institutes and research groups, often termed Research Data Management (RDM). It is foundational to scientific discovery and aligned with the FAIR principles. Although the majority of peer-reviewed journals require raw data deposition in public repositories in alignment with FAIR principles, metadata frequently lacks standardization, hindering effective utilization and sharing of research findings. Here we present FRED, a generalized toolkit for FAIR metadata management in omics research based on a flexible, machine-readable YAML format. FRED enables (i) guided, dialog-based creation of metadata files, (ii) structured semantic validation, (iii) logical cross-file search, (iv) API-based integration with external systems, and (v) self-hosted web deployment. We demonstrate the utility of FRED through a complete annotation workflow applied to a published single-nucleus RNA-seq dataset, covering metadata generation, validation, repository-based discovery, and export to NCBI GEO submission format. FRED is designed for non-computational scientists and specialized facilities alike, and integrates into existing RDM infrastructure without requiring dedicated IT resources.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-61886-9
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

FRED enables standardized FAIR metadata generation and management for omics research

Philipp Goymann, Mario Looso, Jasmin Walter, Noah Knoppik et al.
Scientific Reports
Research Data Management Practices
article

FRED enables standardized FAIR metadata generation and management for omics research

Philipp Goymann, Mario Looso, Jasmin Walter, Noah Knoppik, Carsten Kuenne
article en

Abstract

Scientific research relies on transparent dissemination of data and its associated interpretations, including raw data, metadata, experimental design, and data processing details. Production and handling of research data represents an ongoing challenge, extending beyond publication into individual facilities, institutes and research groups, often termed Research Data Management (RDM). It is foundational to scientific discovery and aligned with the FAIR principles. Although the majority of peer-reviewed journals require raw data deposition in public repositories in alignment with FAIR principles, metadata frequently lacks standardization, hindering effective utilization and sharing of research findings. Here we present FRED, a generalized toolkit for FAIR metadata management in omics research based on a flexible, machine-readable YAML format. FRED enables (i) guided, dialog-based creation of metadata files, (ii) structured semantic validation, (iii) logical cross-file search, (iv) API-based integration with external systems, and (v) self-hosted web deployment. We demonstrate the utility of FRED through a complete annotation workflow applied to a published single-nucleus RNA-seq dataset, covering metadata generation, validation, repository-based discovery, and export to NCBI GEO submission format. FRED is designed for non-computational scientists and specialized facilities alike, and integrates into existing RDM infrastructure without requiring dedicated IT resources.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Max Planck Institute for Heart and Lung Research (DE), Cardio-Pulmonary Institute (DE)
Max-Planck-Institut für Herz- und Lungenforschung
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.