SERENA-6 visual patient-reported outcomes &amp; safety: camizestrant for emerging <i>ESR1</i> m advanced breast cancer during first-line endocrine-basedtherapy

BACKGROUND: We report ophthalmological assessments, patient-reported visual symptoms/functioning, and characterization of visual effect AEs from the SERENA-6 study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study included 315 patients with ER-positive advanced breast cancer receiving first-line aromatase inhibitor (AI)+CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). Patients with emerging ESR1 mutations in ctDNA and no radiological progression were randomized 1:1 to switch to camizestrant+CDK4/6i or continue AI+CDK4/6i. Predefined group term visual effect AEs were graded (NCI-CTCAE v5.0). Ophthalmologic assessments were conducted at baseline, as indicated, and end-of-treatment. Analyses of patient-reported visual effects/functioning were exploratory. RESULTS: Visual effect AEs were reported in 49 (31.6%) patients receiving camizestrant+CDK4/6i and 25 (16.1%) patients receiving AI+CDK4/6i; 90% were grade 1; none led to discontinuation. No changes in visual acuity or ocular structure were observed. Patient-reported visual effects occurred early (by week 2) and were reversible post-treatment. The proportion of patients in the camizestrant+CDK4/6i and AI+CDK4/6i arm reporting short-lived visual effects (<1min) ranged from 60%-67% vs 50%-69%, respectively; visual effects causing no/a low degree of bother: 78%-88% vs 50%-75%, respectively. During treatment, visual functioning was comparable to baseline and between arms. CONCLUSION: If experienced, patient-reported visual effects (including photopsia) with camizestrant+CDK4/6i were short-lived and reversible post-treatment. Visual effect AEs with camizestrant+CDK4/6i were mostly mild and did not require treatment discontinuation or ophthalmologic management. There was no impact on ocular structure, function, or visual acuity; visual effects had little/no impact on daily functioning. These findings support clinical decision-making by further characterizing the visual safety profile of camizestrant in this setting. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04964934.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Oncologist
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/oncolo/oyag278
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

SERENA-6 visual patient-reported outcomes & safety: camizestrant for emerging ESR1 m advanced breast cancer during first-line endocrine-basedtherapy

François‐Clément Bidard, Ranya Habash, P. Kellie Turner, Cynthia Huang Bartlett et al.
The Oncologist
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

SERENA-6 visual patient-reported outcomes & safety: camizestrant for emerging ESR1 m advanced breast cancer during first-line endocrine-basedtherapy

François‐Clément Bidard, Ranya Habash, P. Kellie Turner, Cynthia Huang Bartlett, Erica L. Mayer, Richard D. Baird, Manuel Selvi Miralles, Rebecca Sugarman, L. Moreau, Z Nowecki, Y. Kikawa, Y H Park, Cynthia Ma, Steven Fox, Hiroji Iwata, Ayelet Shai, Wolfgang Janni, Manuel Ruiz-Borrego, Nuri Karadurmus, Giampaolo Bianchini, Adam Brufsky, Javier Pascual, Shin-Cheh Chen, Peter A Fasching, Kyung Hae Jung, Massimo Cristofanilli
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We report ophthalmological assessments, patient-reported visual symptoms/functioning, and characterization of visual effect AEs from the SERENA-6 study. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This double-blind, placebo-controlled phase III study included 315 patients with ER-positive advanced breast cancer receiving first-line aromatase inhibitor (AI)+CDK4/6 inhibitor (CDK4/6i). Patients with emerging ESR1 mutations in ctDNA and no radiological progression were randomized 1:1 to switch to camizestrant+CDK4/6i or continue AI+CDK4/6i. Predefined group term visual effect AEs were graded (NCI-CTCAE v5.0). Ophthalmologic assessments were conducted at baseline, as indicated, and end-of-treatment. Analyses of patient-reported visual effects/functioning were exploratory. RESULTS: Visual effect AEs were reported in 49 (31.6%) patients receiving camizestrant+CDK4/6i and 25 (16.1%) patients receiving AI+CDK4/6i; 90% were grade 1; none led to discontinuation. No changes in visual acuity or ocular structure were observed. Patient-reported visual effects occurred early (by week 2) and were reversible post-treatment. The proportion of patients in the camizestrant+CDK4/6i and AI+CDK4/6i arm reporting short-lived visual effects (<1min) ranged from 60%-67% vs 50%-69%, respectively; visual effects causing no/a low degree of bother: 78%-88% vs 50%-75%, respectively. During treatment, visual functioning was comparable to baseline and between arms. CONCLUSION: If experienced, patient-reported visual effects (including photopsia) with camizestrant+CDK4/6i were short-lived and reversible post-treatment. Visual effect AEs with camizestrant+CDK4/6i were mostly mild and did not require treatment discontinuation or ophthalmologic management. There was no impact on ocular structure, function, or visual acuity; visual effects had little/no impact on daily functioning. These findings support clinical decision-making by further characterizing the visual safety profile of camizestrant in this setting. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04964934.

The Oncologist
Kansai Medical University (JP), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Cornell University (US), Rambam Health Care Campus (IL), Samsung Medical Center (KR), Nagoya City University (JP), University of Ulsan (KR), Cancer Research UK Cambridge Center (GB), AstraZeneca (South Korea) (KR), Presbyterian Hospital (US), Magee-Womens Hospital (US), AstraZeneca (Netherlands) (NL), Nagoya City University Hospital (JP), Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital (TW), Dana-Farber Cancer Institute (US), Royal Marsden Hospital (GB), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand (FR), IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT), AstraZeneca (Poland) (PL), Centrum Onkologii (PL), AstraZeneca (Spain) (ES), Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen (DE), Miami Transplant Institute (US), AstraZeneca (United States) (US), Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío (ES), University Hospital Ulm (DE), Hospital Clínico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria (ES), Institut Curie (FR), University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.