A prognostic analysis of lung cancer surgery in super-elderly patients: a multicenter real-world data study

PURPOSE: With an increasing life expectancy, pulmonary resection is increasingly performed in super-elderly patients with lung cancer; however, the prognostic factors remain unclear. This study evaluated the postoperative survival and prognostic factors in patients aged ≥ 85 years. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 209 patients aged ≥ 85 years who underwent pulmonary resection with curative intent between 2006 and 2015. Clinical variables, including the pulmonary function, comorbidity, nutritional status, and sarcopenia, were analyzed. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The median age was 86 years, and 119 patients (57.0%) were male. The main surgical procedures were lobectomy in 124 patients, segmentectomy in 37, and wedge resection in 47 patients. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 63.6%, and the median OS was 46.5 months. A multivariate analysis identified male sex and reduced vital capacity as independent predictors of a poor survival. In clinical stage I patients, wedge resection was associated with a poorer survival than anatomical resection, although the baseline characteristics differed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary resection may be feasible in carefully selected super-elderly patients. A male sex and reduced vital capacity were associated with poorer outcomes, whereas chronological age was not significantly associated with OS in this cohort.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgery Today
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00595-026-03431-9
Primary Topic
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A prognostic analysis of lung cancer surgery in super-elderly patients: a multicenter real-world data study

S Toyooka, Makio Hayama, Kazuhiko Shien, Hitoshi Nishikawa et al.
Surgery Today
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

A prognostic analysis of lung cancer surgery in super-elderly patients: a multicenter real-world data study

S Toyooka, Makio Hayama, Kazuhiko Shien, Hitoshi Nishikawa, Mototsugu Watanabe, Hiroshi Yaginuma, Toshiya Fujiwara, Daisuke Okutani, K Suzawa, Yuji Hirami, Eisuke Matsuda, Mikio Okazaki, Tsuyoshi Ueno, Shinji Otani
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: With an increasing life expectancy, pulmonary resection is increasingly performed in super-elderly patients with lung cancer; however, the prognostic factors remain unclear. This study evaluated the postoperative survival and prognostic factors in patients aged ≥ 85 years. METHODS: This multicenter retrospective study included 209 patients aged ≥ 85 years who underwent pulmonary resection with curative intent between 2006 and 2015. Clinical variables, including the pulmonary function, comorbidity, nutritional status, and sarcopenia, were analyzed. Survival was evaluated using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS: The median age was 86 years, and 119 patients (57.0%) were male. The main surgical procedures were lobectomy in 124 patients, segmentectomy in 37, and wedge resection in 47 patients. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 63.6%, and the median OS was 46.5 months. A multivariate analysis identified male sex and reduced vital capacity as independent predictors of a poor survival. In clinical stage I patients, wedge resection was associated with a poorer survival than anatomical resection, although the baseline characteristics differed between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary resection may be feasible in carefully selected super-elderly patients. A male sex and reduced vital capacity were associated with poorer outcomes, whereas chronological age was not significantly associated with OS in this cohort.

Surgery Today
Okayama University of Science (JP), Okayama University (JP), Okayama Rosai Hospital (JP)
Okayama University
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.