Populist-inflected governance in a mature democracy: Bureaucratic de-legitimation and executive control in the United Kingdom (2019–2024)

IMPACTThis article is of direct practical relevance to UK policy-makers and officials, including elected politicians, senior civil servants, regulators, parliamentary staff and practitioners working in relevant accountability institutions. It shows how populist and anti-democratic forces can influence governance, even in a mature democracy like the UK: attacks on professional advice, pressure on formally independent bodies, and attempts to force policy through legal or administrative obstacles. By examining anti-civil service ‘blob’ rhetoric, reforms to regulators, and the Rwanda asylum scheme, the article offers practitioners a framework for recognizing these dynamics as they emerge. For politicians and policy-makers, it highlights the risks of treating bureaucratic resistance, legal constraint, or regulatory independence as politically motivated obstruction. For officials and campaigners, it identifies where safeguards may be weakest. Its real-world value lies in helping actors who support democratic governance preserve and strengthen mediating democratic institutions, including in other national and sub-national contexts.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Money & Management
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2026.2701854
Primary Topic
Regulation and Compliance Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Populist-inflected governance in a mature democracy: Bureaucratic de-legitimation and executive control in the United Kingdom (2019–2024)

Sean Kippin
Public Money & Management
Regulation and Compliance Studies
article

Populist-inflected governance in a mature democracy: Bureaucratic de-legitimation and executive control in the United Kingdom (2019–2024)

Sean Kippin
article en

Abstract

IMPACTThis article is of direct practical relevance to UK policy-makers and officials, including elected politicians, senior civil servants, regulators, parliamentary staff and practitioners working in relevant accountability institutions. It shows how populist and anti-democratic forces can influence governance, even in a mature democracy like the UK: attacks on professional advice, pressure on formally independent bodies, and attempts to force policy through legal or administrative obstacles. By examining anti-civil service ‘blob’ rhetoric, reforms to regulators, and the Rwanda asylum scheme, the article offers practitioners a framework for recognizing these dynamics as they emerge. For politicians and policy-makers, it highlights the risks of treating bureaucratic resistance, legal constraint, or regulatory independence as politically motivated obstruction. For officials and campaigners, it identifies where safeguards may be weakest. Its real-world value lies in helping actors who support democratic governance preserve and strengthen mediating democratic institutions, including in other national and sub-national contexts.

Public Money & Management
University of Stirling (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Regulation and Compliance Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.