From anticipated regret to experienced regret: Evidence from a stock market simulation

This study examines the determinants of post-simulation regret in a stock market exercise involving 133 second-year undergraduate management students. Using data from a four-hour trading simulation, it relates post-simulation regret to anticipated regret, portfolio return, trading-style indicators and personality traits. Five regression models are estimated with a common specification, each including a different proxy for trading style. The results show that anticipated regret is positively associated with post-simulation regret, while portfolio return is negatively related to regret and is significant or marginally significant across models. Conscientiousness also emerges as a significant positive predictor. By contrast, none of the trading-style proxies reaches standard significance levels. The findings suggest that regret in simulated trading is explained more by prior regret disposition, portfolio performance, and personality than by trading style.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478)
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v15i4.5098
Primary Topic
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From anticipated regret to experienced regret: Evidence from a stock market simulation

Kevin Kristoforidis, Alain Finet, Julie Laznicka
International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478)
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
article

From anticipated regret to experienced regret: Evidence from a stock market simulation

Kevin Kristoforidis, Alain Finet, Julie Laznicka
article en

Abstract

This study examines the determinants of post-simulation regret in a stock market exercise involving 133 second-year undergraduate management students. Using data from a four-hour trading simulation, it relates post-simulation regret to anticipated regret, portfolio return, trading-style indicators and personality traits. Five regression models are estimated with a common specification, each including a different proxy for trading style. The results show that anticipated regret is positively associated with post-simulation regret, while portfolio return is negatively related to regret and is significant or marginally significant across models. Conscientiousness also emerges as a significant positive predictor. By contrast, none of the trading-style proxies reaches standard significance levels. The findings suggest that regret in simulated trading is explained more by prior regret disposition, portfolio performance, and personality than by trading style.

International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478)Vol. 15(4)
University of Mons (BE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Financial Markets and Investment Strategies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

From anticipated regret to experienced regret: Evidence from a stock market simulation — Kevin Kristoforidis, Alain Finet, et al. · International Journal of Research in Business and Social Science (2147-4478) (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS