Risk of Secondary Pelvic Cancers Following Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Background/Objectives: Secondary pelvic cancer (SC) risk after radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC) remains uncertain; we performed an updated synthesis of observational studies and randomized trials. Methods: We reviewed systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized trials published in 2001–2025 evaluating SC risk after RT for PC. Given potential detection bias from RT-related rectal or bladder bleeding, the primary outcome was relative risk (RR) of death. Results: Across 12 reports—eight systematic reviews/meta-analyses and four randomized trials—comparators were predominantly RP or mixed cohorts; review-level sample sizes were not summed because of potential overlap. In randomized data with >10 years of follow-up, SC occurred in 25.3% of RT-treated patients versus 20.8% in RP/hormone therapy groups, while deaths from other cancers occurred in 8.5% versus 7.2%. The median converted RR of death from SC was 1.05. These estimates may be influenced by unmeasured lifestyle factors such as smoking and baseline comorbidities, which were not accounted for in observational cohorts and are more common among patients receiving RT, who are often less likely to be RP candidates. Conclusions: RT is associated with a small but consistent increase in SC, with a 4.5% absolute excess incidence over >10 years. The observed 1.3% absolute difference in deaths from other cancers was modest and similar in magnitude to the reported perioperative mortality range of approximately 0.2–1.1% after RP, although these risks occur over substantially different time horizons. The smaller excess seen in randomized trials than in retrospective studies suggests that much of the apparent risk in prior reports may reflect confounding and/or detection bias rather than direct radiation effect.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18152382
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk of Secondary Pelvic Cancers Following Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Mutlay Sayan, Pamela Coleman, Crystal Hernandez, Yetkin Tuaç et al.
Cancers
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Risk of Secondary Pelvic Cancers Following Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer

Mutlay Sayan, Pamela Coleman, Crystal Hernandez, Yetkin Tuaç, Leslie A. Lange, Mack Roach III
article en

Abstract

Background/Objectives: Secondary pelvic cancer (SC) risk after radiotherapy (RT) for prostate cancer (PC) remains uncertain; we performed an updated synthesis of observational studies and randomized trials. Methods: We reviewed systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and randomized trials published in 2001–2025 evaluating SC risk after RT for PC. Given potential detection bias from RT-related rectal or bladder bleeding, the primary outcome was relative risk (RR) of death. Results: Across 12 reports—eight systematic reviews/meta-analyses and four randomized trials—comparators were predominantly RP or mixed cohorts; review-level sample sizes were not summed because of potential overlap. In randomized data with >10 years of follow-up, SC occurred in 25.3% of RT-treated patients versus 20.8% in RP/hormone therapy groups, while deaths from other cancers occurred in 8.5% versus 7.2%. The median converted RR of death from SC was 1.05. These estimates may be influenced by unmeasured lifestyle factors such as smoking and baseline comorbidities, which were not accounted for in observational cohorts and are more common among patients receiving RT, who are often less likely to be RP candidates. Conclusions: RT is associated with a small but consistent increase in SC, with a 4.5% absolute excess incidence over >10 years. The observed 1.3% absolute difference in deaths from other cancers was modest and similar in magnitude to the reported perioperative mortality range of approximately 0.2–1.1% after RP, although these risks occur over substantially different time horizons. The smaller excess seen in randomized trials than in retrospective studies suggests that much of the apparent risk in prior reports may reflect confounding and/or detection bias rather than direct radiation effect.

CancersVol. 18(15)
Howard University (US), Ankara University (TR), University of California, San Francisco (US), City of Hope (US), Dana-Farber Brigham Cancer Center (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.