Atomic Simulations of Volatile Coverage on Silicate Surfaces

Abstract Understanding how surface processes shape exosphere formation on airless bodies is limited by how surface properties influence the ejection of volatiles such as Na. Recent studies show that retention and release are sensitive to surface binding energy (SBE), motivating the need for SBE values as a function of mineral type and surface coverage. Currently, Na SBE values are available only for silica at 0 or 1 monolayer (ML) coverage. Here, we present the first SBE distributions at intermediate coverages (0.1–0.75 ML) on silica, along with the first SBE distributions for Na adsorbed on albite and anorthite from 0 to 1 ML. Increasing coverage shifts SBE distributions to lower energies, with mean SBE decreasing even at 0.1 ML. Results demonstrate that SBE depends nonlinearly on coverage and surface composition. We incorporate findings into sputtering models to quantify their impact on yield and energy distributions, highlighting the importance of coverage‐dependent SBEs in exosphere modeling.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Geophysical Research Letters
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1029/2026gl122334
Primary Topic
Iron oxide chemistry and applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Atomic Simulations of Volatile Coverage on Silicate Surfaces

M. Sarantos, D. S. Ebel, S. Verkercke, Liam S. Morrissey et al.
Geophysical Research Letters
Iron oxide chemistry and applications
article

Atomic Simulations of Volatile Coverage on Silicate Surfaces

M. Sarantos, D. S. Ebel, S. Verkercke, Liam S. Morrissey, François Leblanc, Anastasis Georgiou, Amanda Ricketts, Benjamin A. Clouter‐Gergen
article en

Abstract

Abstract Understanding how surface processes shape exosphere formation on airless bodies is limited by how surface properties influence the ejection of volatiles such as Na. Recent studies show that retention and release are sensitive to surface binding energy (SBE), motivating the need for SBE values as a function of mineral type and surface coverage. Currently, Na SBE values are available only for silica at 0 or 1 monolayer (ML) coverage. Here, we present the first SBE distributions at intermediate coverages (0.1–0.75 ML) on silica, along with the first SBE distributions for Na adsorbed on albite and anorthite from 0 to 1 ML. Increasing coverage shifts SBE distributions to lower energies, with mean SBE decreasing even at 0.1 ML. Results demonstrate that SBE depends nonlinearly on coverage and surface composition. We incorporate findings into sputtering models to quantify their impact on yield and energy distributions, highlighting the importance of coverage‐dependent SBEs in exosphere modeling.

Geophysical Research LettersVol. 53(14)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA), Goddard Space Flight Center (US), American Museum of Natural History (US), Centre National d'Études Spatiales (FR), Sorbonne Université (FR), Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas (FR), Laboratoire atmosphères, milieux, observations spatiales (FR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Iron oxide chemistry and applications
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.