Combined pesticide residues and biomarker responses in honey bees ( <i>Apis mellifera</i> ) under realistic field exposure in agricultural landscapes

Honey bees (Apis mellifera) are frequently exposed to complex pesticide mixtures in agricultural landscapes. This field-based study evaluated the presence of both experimentally applied and landscape-derived pesticides in honey bees foraging in a soybean field in Entre Ríos Province, Argentina, and assessed their effects on key biochemical biomarkers. A total of 45 foragers were collected before, during, and after the application of lambda-cyhalothrin, methoxyfenozide, and glyphosate. N = 15 were analyzed for pesticide residues (pre-and post- application: n = 6; during: n = 3), while enzymatic biomarkers were determined in 30 individuals (pre- and post- application: n = 12; during: n = 6). Regarding residues, methoxyfenozide was detected only during application (max. 50 µg kg−1), whereas glyphosate was detected at the three periods, peaking during application (146 µg kg−1). The aminomethylphosphonic acid occurred in 100% of samples across the three studied periods in the range of 27–47 µg kg−1. Lambda-cyhalothrin remained mostly below quantification limits in the three periods. Unexpectedly, several pesticides not applied in the experiment—including 2,4-D, atrazine, imidacloprid, and tebuconazole—were found in 20–40% of total samples, indicating contamination from the broader landscape. Regarding biomarker responses, carboxylesterase activity increased during (+370%) and post-application (+256%), and glutathione S-transferase rose during application (+46%). These findings demonstrate that even under good agricultural practices, honey bees experience simultaneous exposure to multiple agrochemicals that activate detoxification pathways. The integration of multiresidue pesticide profiling with biochemical biomarker responses constitutes a sensitive and ecologically relevant approach for pollinator health assessment under field-realistic exposure scenarios for pesticide monitoring and sustainable management strategies in intensive agricultural regions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Apicultural Research
Published
2026-07-23
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00218839.2026.2697583
Primary Topic
Insect and Pesticide Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Combined pesticide residues and biomarker responses in honey bees ( Apis mellifera ) under realistic field exposure in agricultural landscapes

Melina P. Michlig, Rafael C. Lajmanovích, Ana P. Cuzziol Boccioni, Diego César Blettler et al.
Journal of Apicultural Research
Insect and Pesticide Research
article

Combined pesticide residues and biomarker responses in honey bees ( Apis mellifera ) under realistic field exposure in agricultural landscapes

Melina P. Michlig, Rafael C. Lajmanovích, Ana P. Cuzziol Boccioni, Diego César Blettler, Paola M. Peltzer, José Biurrun Manresa, Andrés M. Attademo, Florencia Valentina Magni, María Rosa Repetti, Luisina Delma Demonte, Guillermina Andrea Fagúndez
article en

Abstract

Honey bees (Apis mellifera) are frequently exposed to complex pesticide mixtures in agricultural landscapes. This field-based study evaluated the presence of both experimentally applied and landscape-derived pesticides in honey bees foraging in a soybean field in Entre Ríos Province, Argentina, and assessed their effects on key biochemical biomarkers. A total of 45 foragers were collected before, during, and after the application of lambda-cyhalothrin, methoxyfenozide, and glyphosate. N = 15 were analyzed for pesticide residues (pre-and post- application: n = 6; during: n = 3), while enzymatic biomarkers were determined in 30 individuals (pre- and post- application: n = 12; during: n = 6). Regarding residues, methoxyfenozide was detected only during application (max. 50 µg kg−1), whereas glyphosate was detected at the three periods, peaking during application (146 µg kg−1). The aminomethylphosphonic acid occurred in 100% of samples across the three studied periods in the range of 27–47 µg kg−1. Lambda-cyhalothrin remained mostly below quantification limits in the three periods. Unexpectedly, several pesticides not applied in the experiment—including 2,4-D, atrazine, imidacloprid, and tebuconazole—were found in 20–40% of total samples, indicating contamination from the broader landscape. Regarding biomarker responses, carboxylesterase activity increased during (+370%) and post-application (+256%), and glutathione S-transferase rose during application (+46%). These findings demonstrate that even under good agricultural practices, honey bees experience simultaneous exposure to multiple agrochemicals that activate detoxification pathways. The integration of multiresidue pesticide profiling with biochemical biomarker responses constitutes a sensitive and ecologically relevant approach for pollinator health assessment under field-realistic exposure scenarios for pesticide monitoring and sustainable management strategies in intensive agricultural regions.

Journal of Apicultural Research
Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (AR), Universidad Nacional del Litoral (AR), Centro Científico Tecnológico - Tucumán (AR)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Insect and Pesticide Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.