Privacy, temporal flexibility and connection: how online spaces shape abortion support

BACKGROUND: Online spaces are increasingly used by people seeking support around sexual and reproductive healthcare and can offer anonymity and flexibility. Relatively little is known about how these spaces are used in relation to abortion. This article explores what informal online spaces (eg, social media and discussion forums) offer to those seeking support around abortion, in the face of increasingly digitalised healthcare, persistent abortion stigma and resource constraints on sexual and reproductive health services. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with individuals who had sought abortion-related support online. Twenty-three women, aged 20-54 years, who had undergone abortion and were living in Scotland at the time of the interview were recruited through social media and online advertisements. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified three principal affordances of online spaces that shaped participants' experiences of accessing support online: (1) privacy-participants chose online spaces based on perceptions of the potential (in)visibility of their interactions with abortion-related content and anonymity; (2) temporal flexibility-support could be sought as and when needed, derived from posts long after they were created; and (3) connection to others with experiential knowledge of abortion-engagement ranged from active interactions to anonymous browsing, with one-way participation providing meaningful support at low social cost. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that online spaces can provide flexible, stigma-sensitive, abortion-affirming support. Those who provide abortion services should consider ways in which trustworthy online spaces can be integrated into existing care pathways to reduce isolation and address unmet social support needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjsrh-2026-203253
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Contraception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Privacy, temporal flexibility and connection: how online spaces shape abortion support

Ruth Lewis, Carrie Purcell, Rachel Victoria Wilson-Lowe, Lisa McDaid
BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
Reproductive Health and Contraception
article

Privacy, temporal flexibility and connection: how online spaces shape abortion support

Ruth Lewis, Carrie Purcell, Rachel Victoria Wilson-Lowe, Lisa McDaid
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Online spaces are increasingly used by people seeking support around sexual and reproductive healthcare and can offer anonymity and flexibility. Relatively little is known about how these spaces are used in relation to abortion. This article explores what informal online spaces (eg, social media and discussion forums) offer to those seeking support around abortion, in the face of increasingly digitalised healthcare, persistent abortion stigma and resource constraints on sexual and reproductive health services. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews with individuals who had sought abortion-related support online. Twenty-three women, aged 20-54 years, who had undergone abortion and were living in Scotland at the time of the interview were recruited through social media and online advertisements. Data were analysed using reflexive thematic analysis. RESULTS: We identified three principal affordances of online spaces that shaped participants' experiences of accessing support online: (1) privacy-participants chose online spaces based on perceptions of the potential (in)visibility of their interactions with abortion-related content and anonymity; (2) temporal flexibility-support could be sought as and when needed, derived from posts long after they were created; and (3) connection to others with experiential knowledge of abortion-engagement ranged from active interactions to anonymous browsing, with one-way participation providing meaningful support at low social cost. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings suggest that online spaces can provide flexible, stigma-sensitive, abortion-affirming support. Those who provide abortion services should consider ways in which trustworthy online spaces can be integrated into existing care pathways to reduce isolation and address unmet social support needs.

BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health
The University of Queensland (AU), The Open University (GB), Healthcare Improvement Scotland (GB), Public Health Scotland (GB)
Chief Scientist Office, Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorate, Medical Research Council
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Reproductive Health and Contraception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.