Risk and vulnerability in knife‐related crime: Insights from official data

Abstract Purpose This study examines psychological and personal differences among young males engaged in violent knife offending, violent non‐knife offending, and non‐violent offending within a Youth Justice Service in London. By distinguishing knife‐related crime from other forms of violence, the research aims to identify unique psychosocial vulnerabilities associated with violent knife offending and to consider implications for assessment and intervention. Methods Case files of young males aged 12–18 under Youth Justice Service supervision between 2018 and 2022 were analysed using data recorded in the AssetPlus assessment tool. Comparative analyses explored group differences in victimisation, gang association, trauma‐related mental health difficulties, and neurodiversity needs. Moderated mediation models were employed to examine the relationship between gang involvement, victimisation, and knife‐related offending. Results Young people involved in knife‐related offending exhibited higher levels of gang association, victimisation, and trauma compared to both violent non‐knife and non‐violent groups. Victimisation significantly moderated the relationship between gang involvement and knife‐related offending, amplifying the likelihood of violent behaviour among those with dual exposure. Mental health difficulties, although prevalent, did not mediate this relationship. AssetPlus facilitated comprehensive information‐gathering but showed inconsistencies in analytical application, with variability in data entry quality highlighting the need for standardised quality assurance. Conclusions Findings indicate that violent knife offending represents a distinct subgroup characterised by elevated psychosocial vulnerabilities. Trauma‐informed and contextually aware interventions are essential, with supplementary assessments focusing on gang involvement and victimisation recommended to enhance understanding of individual risk profiles and support more tailored responses to knife‐related offending.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Legal and Criminological Psychology
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/lcrp.70050
Primary Topic
Crime Patterns and Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Risk and vulnerability in knife‐related crime: Insights from official data

Emma K. A. Alleyne, Ana Paula de Abreu Figueira
Legal and Criminological Psychology
Crime Patterns and Interventions
article

Risk and vulnerability in knife‐related crime: Insights from official data

Emma K. A. Alleyne, Ana Paula de Abreu Figueira
article en

Abstract

Abstract Purpose This study examines psychological and personal differences among young males engaged in violent knife offending, violent non‐knife offending, and non‐violent offending within a Youth Justice Service in London. By distinguishing knife‐related crime from other forms of violence, the research aims to identify unique psychosocial vulnerabilities associated with violent knife offending and to consider implications for assessment and intervention. Methods Case files of young males aged 12–18 under Youth Justice Service supervision between 2018 and 2022 were analysed using data recorded in the AssetPlus assessment tool. Comparative analyses explored group differences in victimisation, gang association, trauma‐related mental health difficulties, and neurodiversity needs. Moderated mediation models were employed to examine the relationship between gang involvement, victimisation, and knife‐related offending. Results Young people involved in knife‐related offending exhibited higher levels of gang association, victimisation, and trauma compared to both violent non‐knife and non‐violent groups. Victimisation significantly moderated the relationship between gang involvement and knife‐related offending, amplifying the likelihood of violent behaviour among those with dual exposure. Mental health difficulties, although prevalent, did not mediate this relationship. AssetPlus facilitated comprehensive information‐gathering but showed inconsistencies in analytical application, with variability in data entry quality highlighting the need for standardised quality assurance. Conclusions Findings indicate that violent knife offending represents a distinct subgroup characterised by elevated psychosocial vulnerabilities. Trauma‐informed and contextually aware interventions are essential, with supplementary assessments focusing on gang involvement and victimisation recommended to enhance understanding of individual risk profiles and support more tailored responses to knife‐related offending.

Legal and Criminological Psychology
University of Kent (GB)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Crime Patterns and Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Risk and vulnerability in knife‐related crime: Insights from official data — Emma K. A. Alleyne, Ana Paula de Abreu Figueira · Legal and Criminological Psychology (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS