The Quality of Suicide-Related Stories Generated by Large Language Models

Abstract: Background: Suicide-related media is known to influence suicide rates. Large language models (LLMs), a form of generative artificial intelligence (AI), are increasingly being used as a writing tool. However, the quality of LLM-generated suicide-related content has yet to be assessed. Aims: We aimed to examine suicide-related outputs from three LLMs (GPT-4, Grok, ERNIE) to characterize output quality. Methods: We provided the LLMs with 11 prompts to write different types of suicide-related content common in public media, each in five writing/content styles (broadsheet news report, tabloid news report, adult fiction, teen fiction, social media influencer). We used 3 × 2 chi square tests to compare characteristics of the outputs particularly related to adherence to responsible media guidelines for suicide reporting and overarching narratives. Results: AI outputs were generated from March 12 to July 11, 2024. A total of 147, 263, and 143 responses from GPT-4, Grok, and ERNIE were analyzed, respectively. Willingness to respond to suicide-related prompts and narrative content varied substantially across the three LLMs, with Grok producing more responses than the other two (GPT-4 = 53%, Grok = 96%, ERNIE = 52%). GPT-4 was more likely to generate emotionally supportive and antistigma messaging. Grok more frequently included harmful details such as suicide methods and romanticized portrayals. ERNIE emphasized male suicide, social support, and societal/community solutions. The proportion of outputs communicating stories of hope and recovery from a suicide crisis was both relatively low and consistent across the LLMs (16–22%). Limitations: This study examined specific prompts posed to three specific LLMs during a single epoch of time. Conclusions: LLMs produce a variety of suicide-related story content when prompted. Some stories, particularly those generated by Grok, were inconsistent with responsible media guidelines and only a minority of stories focused on hope and recovery. Engagement with AI companies to promote safer and more accurate suicide-related content is warranted as the use of LLMs continues to expand.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Crisis
Published
2026-07-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1027/0227-5910/a001069
Primary Topic
Mental Health via Writing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Quality of Suicide-Related Stories Generated by Large Language Models

Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Jo Robinson, Benedikt Till, Vera Yu Men et al.
Crisis
Mental Health via Writing
article

The Quality of Suicide-Related Stories Generated by Large Language Models

Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Jo Robinson, Benedikt Till, Vera Yu Men, Jane Pirkis, Ayal Schaffer, Rosalie Steinberg, Mark Sinyor, Eileen Danaee, Rachel H. B. Mitchell, Prudence Po Ming Chan, Samantha G. Mason
article en

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Suicide-related media is known to influence suicide rates. Large language models (LLMs), a form of generative artificial intelligence (AI), are increasingly being used as a writing tool. However, the quality of LLM-generated suicide-related content has yet to be assessed. Aims: We aimed to examine suicide-related outputs from three LLMs (GPT-4, Grok, ERNIE) to characterize output quality. Methods: We provided the LLMs with 11 prompts to write different types of suicide-related content common in public media, each in five writing/content styles (broadsheet news report, tabloid news report, adult fiction, teen fiction, social media influencer). We used 3 × 2 chi square tests to compare characteristics of the outputs particularly related to adherence to responsible media guidelines for suicide reporting and overarching narratives. Results: AI outputs were generated from March 12 to July 11, 2024. A total of 147, 263, and 143 responses from GPT-4, Grok, and ERNIE were analyzed, respectively. Willingness to respond to suicide-related prompts and narrative content varied substantially across the three LLMs, with Grok producing more responses than the other two (GPT-4 = 53%, Grok = 96%, ERNIE = 52%). GPT-4 was more likely to generate emotionally supportive and antistigma messaging. Grok more frequently included harmful details such as suicide methods and romanticized portrayals. ERNIE emphasized male suicide, social support, and societal/community solutions. The proportion of outputs communicating stories of hope and recovery from a suicide crisis was both relatively low and consistent across the LLMs (16–22%). Limitations: This study examined specific prompts posed to three specific LLMs during a single epoch of time. Conclusions: LLMs produce a variety of suicide-related story content when prompted. Some stories, particularly those generated by Grok, were inconsistent with responsible media guidelines and only a minority of stories focused on hope and recovery. Engagement with AI companies to promote safer and more accurate suicide-related content is warranted as the use of LLMs continues to expand.

Crisis
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Sunnybrook Health Science Centre (CA), The University of Melbourne (AU), Simon Fraser University (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Toronto Rehabilitation Institute (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Orygen Youth Health (AU), Wiener Krankenanstaltenverbund (AT), Melbourne Health (AU), Medical University of Vienna (AT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Mental Health via Writing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.